Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 5:19417381241275659. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/19417381241275659

Table 1.

Study and baseline patient characteristics

Author (Year) Body Region Sample Size, n Age, Years (Mean) Male/Female Symptom Duration, Months BMI, kg/m2
Altahawi et al 1 (2020) Lateral elbow 23 53.5 ± 8.3 12/11 23 ± 18.5 NR
Baker and Mahoney 5 (2020) Gluteal 29 62 ± 11.7 3/26 41 ± 60.5 28
Barnes et al 6 (2015) Lateral and medial elbow 19 55.3 ± 7.3 10/9 >6 NR
Battista et al 7 (2018) Lateral elbow 7 NR NR 21.4 ± 13.5 NR
Boden et al 8 (2019) Lateral and medial elbow 30 51 ± 8 18/12 25 ± 21 NR
Bradberry et al 9 (2018) Tensor fascia lata 2 52 ± 1 0/2 3.5 ± 0.25 NR
Bureau et al 11 (2022) Lateral elbow 31 46.7 ± 8.0 8/11 23.3 ± 22.5 NR
Chalian et al 12 (2021) Lateral elbow 37 51.3 ± 8.9 15/22 >6 NR
Fick et al 19 (2021) Lateral and medial elbow 87 48.8 ± 9.0 47/40 22 31.3 ± 10.0
Patellar 38 27.1 ± 12.9 29/9 15 26.2 ± 7.6
Midportion Achilles 23 50.6 ± 15.4 8/15 38.9 30.0 ± 7.8
Insertional Achilles 34 52.2 ± 11.6 13/21 26 32.9 ± 7.5
Plantar fascia 80 47.2 ± 12.2 19/61 31 30.4 ± 6.4
Jacobson et al 23 (2016) Gluteal 15 60 ± 13.1 5/10 NR NR
Kirschner et al 25 (2021) Lateral and medial elbow 19 47.1 ± 15.5 11/8 25.4 ± 30.5 26.3 ± 4.7
Koh et al 26 (2013) a
Seng et al 36 (2016)
Ang et al 4 (2021)
Lateral elbow 20 45.5 ± 7.1 7/13 12.5 ± 11.5 NR
Lavallee and Bush 28 (2021) Lateral and medial elbow, Achilles, patellar,
plantar fascia
103 49.1 ± 12.4 42/61 >3 30.8 ± 6.07
Martin et al 30 (2019) Lateral elbow 35 48.3 ± 7.6 19/16 >3 26.05 ± 3.15
Nakagawa et al 33 (2023) Lateral elbow 15 51 ± 6.0 6/9 30 ± 25.5 NR
Rupe et al 35 (2023) Lateral elbow 52 (57 procedures) 46.9 ± 8.5 28/29 24.3 27.7 ± 4.5
Stover et al 38 (2019) Lateral and medial elbow 131 (144 procedures) 48.1 ± 9.8 77/54 14 [10, 24] 32.2 ± 7.7
Wahezi et al 43 (2023) Iliotibial band 48 (56 procedures) 67 ± 13.3 4/44 >6 28 ± 5

BMI, body mass index; NR, not reported.

a

Articles by Seng et al 36 and Ang et al 4 were longitudinal follow-up studies of the original research article by Koh et al 26 ; thus, baseline demographic data were the same for all 3 articles.