Tideiksaar 1993.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial. Method of randomisation not reported. No blinding. No losses to follow up reported. Intention‐to‐treat analysis. |
|
Participants | Setting: one geriatric ward in the USA. N=70 Sample: 14% male. Age: mean (range) 84 (67‐97) years. Inclusion criteria: poor bed mobility (according to one or more abnormal factors on an observational 9 point performance‐orientated environmental mobility screen). Exclusion criteria: nil. |
|
Interventions | Bed‐alarm system that produces an audible alert when the patient is about to exit or exits their bed. Control group received standard care. |
|
Outcomes | 1. Frequency of patient falls out of bed; 2. Frequency of all falls; 3. Frequency of patient injuries due to all falls; 4. Alarm response times; 5. Number of true alarms. | |
Notes | No significant difference in outcomes demonstrated. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information about the sequence generation process was available to permit judgement. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information about the sequence generation process was available to permit judgement. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No incomplete outcome data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The study protocol was not available. |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Outcomes were recorded by the study nurses who were not blind to intervention group. |