Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 18;2012(1):CD008931. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008931.pub3

Tideiksaar 1993.

Methods Randomised controlled trial.
Method of randomisation not reported.
No blinding.
No losses to follow up reported.
Intention‐to‐treat analysis.
Participants Setting: one geriatric ward in the USA.
N=70
Sample: 14% male.
Age: mean (range) 84 (67‐97) years.
Inclusion criteria: poor bed mobility (according to one or more abnormal factors on an observational 9 point performance‐orientated environmental mobility screen).
Exclusion criteria: nil.
Interventions Bed‐alarm system that produces an audible alert when the patient is about to exit or exits their bed.
Control group received standard care.
Outcomes 1. Frequency of patient falls out of bed; 
 2. Frequency of all falls; 
 3. Frequency of patient injuries due to all falls; 
 4. Alarm response times; 
 5. Number of true alarms.
Notes No significant difference in outcomes demonstrated.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information about the sequence generation process was available to permit judgement.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information about the sequence generation process was available to permit judgement.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk The study protocol was not available.
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Outcomes were recorded by the study nurses who were not blind to intervention group.