Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 1;25(2):82–88. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2024.23050

Table 5.

Distribution of Some of the Participant Views on Smoke-free Zones According to Smoking Use

Propositions Smokers
n (%)
Nonsmokers
n (%)
P
Yes NoNo Idea Yes NoNo Idea
Smoke-free zones should be increased. 90 (57.7) 66 (42.3) 356 (90.8) 36 (9.2) <.001
Information about smoke-free zones is sufficient. 59 (37.8) 97 (62.2) 69 (17.6) 323 (82.4) <.001
Smoke-free zone inspections are sufficient. 28 (17.9) 128 (82.1) 41 (10.5) 351 (89.5) .017
I support the existence of smoke-free zones. 111 (71.2) 45 (28.8) 351 (89.5) 41 (10.5) <.001
The prohibition of smoking is a complex and difficult regulation to implement. 80 (51.3) 76 (48.7) 141 (36) 251 (64) .001
Prohibition of smoking is an attack on the rights of individuals. 54 (34.6) 102 (65.4) 61 (15.6) 331 (84.4) <.001
Smoking in universities encourages students to smoke. 69 (44.2) 87 (55.8) 214 (54.6) 178 (45.4) .029
As a result of the smoking ban, there will be an increase in smoking cessation. 40 (25.6) 116 (74.4) 184 (46.9) 208 (53.1) <.001
Studies on smoking cessation (trainings/seminars) should be conducted in universities. 96 (61.5) 60 (38.5) 312 (79.6) 80 (20.4) <.001
There should be smoke-free campus policies at universities. 49 (31.4) 107 (68.6) 295 (75.3) 97 (24.7) <.001
If there is a smoke-free campus policy, the rate of smoking cessation increases. 50 (32.1) 106 (67.9) 239 (61) 153 (39) <.001
If a smoke-free campus policy is implemented, it will be easy to adapt to this process. 45 (28.8) 111 (71.2) 195 (49.7) 197 (50.3) <.001

Values in bold indicate statistical significance.