Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 17;20:175. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01296-y

Table 10.

Effect of fine registration by the second stage with single-plant images

A. thaliana Sample NCC [-] ΔMP [px] OR [%] ΔMPConvex [px] ORConvex [%]
RGB-to-ChlF
Single stage* 15 × 12 = 180 0.86 ± 0.02 1.78 ± 1.14 93.1 ± 4.4 1.69 ± 1.14 97.4 ± 2.5
Second stage 15 × 12 = 180 0.91 ± 0.02 1.41 ± 0.86 94.4 ± 3.7 1.32 ± 0.89 98.0 ± 2.3
HSI-to-ChlF
Single stage* 15 × 12 = 180 0.90 ± 0.01 3.70 ± 1.78 89.4 ± 6.6 3.64 ± 1.80 95.2 ± 4.0
Second stage 15 × 12 = 180 0.93 ± 0.02 3.38 ± 1.90 91.8 ± 6.9 3.39 ± 1.93 96.6 ± 4.2

Note: Image metrics were investigated with NCC-adaptive approach and ChlF as reference registration target. Mean ± SD. *As in Tables 5 and 6, but the averaging was applied to the images of single objects instead of the images at plate level with 12 individual objects