Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 26;16(9):2191–2201. doi: 10.1111/os.14189

TABLE 1.

Descriptive characteristics of patients.

Case No. Age at surgery (year) Sex (F/M) Side (L/R) No. previous surgeries NF‐1 (Y/N) Crawford classification Paley classification Additional procedures Follow‐up (m)
1 39 F L 0 Y IV 4A Secondary arthrolysis for knee; Secondary bone grafting 30.4
2 53 F L 2 N IV 4C Fibular grafting; Secondary bone grafting 91.8
3 29 F R 2 N IV 4A Sliding osteotomy; Correction for the equinus deformity 62.1
4 39 F R 1 N IV 3 Fibular ORIF 58.6
5 19 M R 1 N IV 4B Correction for the femur and foot; Secondary arthrolysis for knee; Secondary ORIF with bone grafting 31.8
6 23 F R 2 Y IV 4B Secondary arthrolysis for knee; Secondary ORIF with bone grafting 21.3
7 30 M R 1 N IV 3 Secondary correction for the ankle 20.2
8 18 M L 0 Y IV 4B / 23.1
9 36 M L 0 Y IV 3 Correction for the equinus deformity 15.4
10 48 M L 2 N IV 3 Correction for the proximal tibia and foot 19.8
11 36 F R 0 N IV 4A Correction for the equinus deformity 20.8
12 27 F R 1 Y IV 4B Sliding osteotomy; Secondary correction for the foot 34.3
13 43 M R 0 Y IV 4B Correction for the ankle; Secondary ORIF with bone grafting 17.6
14 32 M L 0 Y IV 4A Sliding osteotomy; Secondary arthrolysis for knee; Secondary correction for the foot 33.7
Mean/Median 33.7 N/A N/A 1.0* N/A N/A N/A N/A 26.8*
*

Non‐normally distributed data were presented as median.