Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 4:02537176241238417. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/02537176241238417

Table 1.

Socio-demographic Profiles of the Participants.

S.No. Participant ID Age of the Adolescent Gender Current Educational Status Comorbidity Mother’s Age and Occupation Father’s Age and Occupation
1. P01 17 M Special school Comorbid moderate IDa 50, professional
2. P02 15 M 9th grade   46, professional
3. P03 16 F 11th grade   46, professional
4. P04 15 M 7th grade Comorbid mild ID 45, homemaker 46, professional
5. P05 16 M 10th grade   45, professional 48, professional
6. P06 16 M Special school Comorbid mild ID 48, homemaker
7. P07 16 M 11th grade   50, homemaker 52, professional
8. P08 15 F Special school Comorbid moderate ID 46, homemaker 50, professional

—Not participated; ID—Intellectual disability. aAs part of comprehensive diagnostic assessments, all children underwent clinical evaluation of intellectual and socio-adaptive functioning. Assessments such as the Vineland Social Maturity Scale, developmental screening tests, and intelligence assessments were available from the patient file. These assessments were conducted as part of routine clinical evaluation and not for study.