Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 23;110(11):7234–7244. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001950

Table 2.

Domain scores (%) of the 16 clinical practice guidelines assessed using the AGREE-II instrument.

Domain AASLD (2023) AGA (2022) APASAL (2017) ASCO (2024) Canada (2021) Chinese (2023) ESAL (2018) ESMO (2021) Japan (2023) Korea (2022) NCCN (2024) Taiwan (2024) APPLE (2020) BCLC (2022)
Domain 1: scope and purpose 91.67% 92.22% 83.33% 100.00% 98.89% 88.89%/ 100.00% 67.78% 94.44% 100.00% 81.11% 94.44% 95.56% 72.22%
Domain 2: stakeholder involvement 69.44% 83.33% 61.11% 94.44% 71.11% 58.33%/ 78.89% 51.11% 80.56% 76.67% 61.11% 71.30% 63.33% 62.22%
Domain 3: rigor of development 67.71% 88.75% 76.25% 96.25% 70.42% 57.99% 88.75% 68.75% 97.92% 93.75% 88.54% 97.92% 65.42% 67.08%
Domain 4: clarity of presentation 100.00% 95.56% 95.56% 97.78% 84.44% 80.56% 95.56% 96.67% 100.00%/ 100.00% 97.22% 97.22% 91.11% 100.00%
Domain 5: applicability 83.33% 73.33% 78.33% 80.0% 78.33% 77.08% 86.67% 85.00% 100.00% 80.00% 77.50% 79.86% 73.33% 74.17%
Domain 6: editorial independence 100.00% 91.67% 83.33% 91.67% 91.67% 100.00% 93.33% 80.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 86.67% 88.33%
Overall (range 1~7) 6.09 6.21 5.72 6.78 5.76 5.33 6.39 5.43 6.80 6.37 5.80 6.41 5.54 5.47

AASLD, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; AGA, the American Gastroenterological Association; APASL, The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver; APPLE, the Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert; ASCO, American Society of Clinical Oncology; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; EASL, European Association for the Study of the Liver; ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network.