Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 21;11(6):1741–1750. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.109

Table 2.

Performance of ECog-12 to differentiate cognitive statuses

ECog-12 status CI vs CU AUC (95%CI) MCI vs CU AUC (95%CI) dementia vs MCI AUC (95%CI) CI with amyloid pathology vs others (CU&CI without amyloid pathology) AUC (95%CI)
Average ECog-12
ECog-12 of pt* CP ≥ 1.36 AUC = 0.7 (0.68-0.73) CP ≥ 1.37 AUC = 0.7 (0.67-0.72) CP ≥ 1.7 AUC = 0.57 (0.53-0.61) CP ≥ 1.36 AUC = 0.65 (0.63-0.68)
Ecog-12 of sp* CP ≥ 1.45 AUC = 0.78 (0.76–0.8) CP ≥ 1.27 AUC = 0.75 (0.72–0.77) CP ≥ 1.9 AUC = 0.77 (0.74–0.8) CP ≥ 1.45 AUC = 0.75 (0.73–0.78)
ECog-12 of pt with memory concern ** AUC = 0.79 (0.77–0.82) AUC = 0.8 (0.77–0.82) AUC = 0.49 (0.46–0.53) AUC = 0.71 (0.69–0.73)
Categorized ECog-12
Any consistent SCD categorization of ECog-12 for pt response AUC = 0.69 (0.67–0.71) AUC = 0.68 (0.67–0.71) AUC = 0.53 (0.49-0.56) AUC = 0.65 (0.62–0.67)
Any consistent SCD” group ECog-12 for pt with positive memory concern complaint vs others*** AUC = 0.73 (0.7–0.75) AUC = 0.72 (0.67–0.75) AUC = 0.51 (0.48-0.55) AUC = 0.68 (0.66–0.71)
Any consistent SCD Ecog-12 of pt + concern vs none of both AUC = 0.79 (0.77–0.82) AUC = 0.8 (0.77–0.82) AUC =0.49 (0.46-0.51) AUC = 0.71 (0.69–0.74)
Any consistent SCD categorization of ECog-12 for sp response AUC = 0.78 (0.76–0.8) AUC = 0.74 (0.71–0.76) AUC = 0.66 (0.64-0.68) AUC = 0.74 (0.72–0.76)

CP, cutpoint; AUC, Area Under the Curve of the “Receiver Operating Characteristic” curve; pt, self-participant; sp, study partner; CI’ cognitive impaired participants; CU, cognitively unimpaired participants; * Dichotomous score on each cutpoint; ** Performance of ECog-12 combined with positive concern question compared with none of high ECog and memory concern; ***AUC derived from the performance of participants who had any consistent SCD ECog-12 score and positive memory concern complaint compared to those without any consistent SCD in ECog12 and memory concern complaint, as well as those with positive only one of each.