Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 21;11(6):1741–1750. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.109

Table 3.

Association between ECog-12 and cognitive impairment (MCI and AD)

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis (model 1*) Multivariable analysis (model 2**)
Crude OR (95%CI) P value Adjusted OR (95%CI) P value Adjusted OR (95%CI) P value
Average ECog-12 of participants 10 (7.4–13.76) <0.001 8.79 (6.32–12.43) <0.001
Average ECog-12 of study partner 38.01 (25.12–59.18) <0.001 35.45 (22.41–58.03) < 0.001
Age 1.02 (1.01–1.04) <0.001 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.44 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.22
Male gender 1.91 (1.56–2.34) <0.001 2.05 (1.58–2.67) <0.001 1.71 (1.28–2.28) 0.003
Education 0.95 (0.87–0.94) <0.001 0.88 (0.83–0.92) <0.001 0.94 (0.88–0.99) 0.02
Race (white) 1.99 (1.45–2.65) <0.001 1.5 (0.97–2.34) 0.07 1.18 (0.74–1.91) 0.49
Married 1.62 (1.29–2.03) <0.001 1.37(1.02–1.84) 0.04 0.82 (0.59–1.13) 0.23
APOE4 positive 2.16 (1.8–2.6) <0.001 2.07 (1.69–2.56) <0.001 1.69 (1.34–2.13) <0.001
AUC 0.795 0.87

*Model1: association of average ECog-12 score from self-participants and cognitive impairment adjusted with age, gender, educational years, race, marital status, and APOE4 status; **Model2: association of average ECog-12 score from study partners and cognitive impairment adjusted with age, gender, educational years, race, marital status, and APOE4 status