Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e080873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080873

Table 4. Summary of participant justification responses for deeming each patient scenario unsuitable for home monitoring.

Scenario Participant justification Example quote
1Mr. Smith high risk
  • Advanced/high-risk glaucoma

  • Requires treatment, not monitoring

  • Risk of increased patient anxiety

  • Requires full comprehensive in-person assessment

  • Severe glaucoma in a relatively young patient on maximum medical treatment; IOP control borderline although VF is stable it is for a relatively short duration. Need more fields to establish long-term stability candidate for HES (hospital eye services) care

  • Participant: Consultant, with 5–10 years of experience

2Ms. AdamsLow risk
  • Stable, OHT patient

  • Low risk of conversion to glaucoma

  • Most would discharge to community care

  • In our unit this pt would be discharged to community optometry glaucoma service and would recommend optom to see 24 monthly.’

  • Participant: Consultant with >10 years of experience

3Mr. PatelHigh risk
  • Advanced/high-risk glaucoma

  • More likely to struggle with home monitoring due to frailty/compliance

  • Requires treatment and assessment rather than monitoring

  • Risk of increased patient anxiety

  • If his visual fields are not reliable in the clinic, then we would have to test out if he was any better with the home version before considering. If not, then I would leave it and do OCT in the clinic.

  • Participant: Consultant with >10 years of experience

4Ms. McEwanLow risk
  • NTG, stable (5 years) patient

  • Low risk of progression

  • May be a waste of resources

  • ‘Low risk—not worth the extra resources’

  • Participant: Consultant with 5–10 years of experience

NTG, normal tension glaucomaOHT, ocular hypertensionVFvisual field