Table 3.
Comparison table for D.I%, M%, MDA, and H₂O₂ content of the experimental mung bean plants
| Comparison | D.I%* | M% | MDA | H₂O₂ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T9 vs. T13 | -7.20 | -10.20% | -11.10% | -4.10% |
| T10 vs. T14 | -8.90 | -19.50% | -6.10 | -7.40% |
| T11 vs. T15 | -10.80 | -20.00% | -18.70% | -11.50% |
| T12 vs. T16 | -43.30 | -55.60% | -24.10% | -13.80% |
| T5 vs. T6 | -26.20 | -36.60% | -9.10 | -12.30% |
| T5 vs. T7 | -58.50 | -69.00% | -20.60 | -22.60% |
| T5 vs. T8 | -80.70 | -93.00% | -37.00% | -26.00% |
| T5 vs. T9 | -20.40 | -31.00% | -10.50 | -23.60% |
| T6 vs. T10 | -13.80 | -14.50% | -16.40 | -20.10% |
| T7 vs. T11 | -36.90 | -54.50% | -17.10% | -16.10% |
| T8 vs. T12 | -11.80% | -10.00% | -19.90 | -20.50% |
*D. I%: Disease incidence percentage; M%: Mortality percentage; MDA: Malondialdehyde contents; H₂O₂: Hydrogen peroxide contents