Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 19;24:1099. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05813-y

Table 4.

Table of comparison among various treatments for growth and yield parameters

Comparison *NOP/P PW NS/P 1000SW PC% PH NOB/P LA TC
T9 vs. T13 17.00% 12.60% 36.00% 46.30% 8.90% 8.50% 17.20% 16.20% 3.60%
T10 vs. T14 27.00% 11.30% 28.60% 37.20% 8.60 -9.10% 7.90% 32.00% 6.80%
T11 vs. T15 14.50% 7.90% 35.00% 10.70% 11.60% 4.40% 10.00% 29.00% 3.60%
T5 vs. T6 14.60% 12.70% 6.30% 25.00% 4.80% 15.60% -11.50% 15.10% 13.70%
T5 vs. T7 36.60% 30.80% 37.50% 46.40% 13.30% 29.40% 23.10% 23.70% 19.90%
T5 vs. T8 48.70% 46.30% 50.10% 62.50% 20.30% 34.00% 38.40% 34.40% 24.70%
T5 vs. T9 14.60% 48.90% 56.30% 33.00% 31.40% 19.50% 11.50% 19.40% 12.00%
T6 vs. T10 10.60% 47.60% 64.70% 22.80% 31.70% 14.10% 17.10% 14.00% 5.20%
T7 vs. T11 10.70% 42.60% 27.40% 32.40% 22.10% 5.10% 25.00% 16.50% 7.70%
T8 vs. T12 6.60% 39.50% 25.00% 26.00% 20.50% 3.40% 13.90% 14.20% 9.30%
T12 vs. T16 13.80% 13.20% 30.00% 7.80% 11.90% 6.40% 14.60% 38.10% 5.40%