Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 28;15(46):19375–19389. doi: 10.1039/d4sc05598e

Fig. 4. Fitting effects of the (a) CatBoost, (b) XGBoost, and (c) GBR model-predicted and true work functions on the test set. Individual SHAP plots of the CatBoost model predictions for (d) Br6Sb2, (e) Mo2Te4, and (f) Au2Br4. The SHAP positive (red) and negative (blue) feature weights are given for the three materials. The bar size represents the SHAP value. The base value is the mean value of the work function in the training data. The output value f(x) represents the predicted work function of the three materials.

Fig. 4