Table 2. JBI Quality appraisal checklist for all included studies of GMP service utilization among children less than two years in Ethiopia, 2023.
Included studies | JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross Sectional Studies(Yes, No, Unclear) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If Yes(>=50%).....low risk(two raters).....1=Yes 2=No 3=Unclear | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Appropriate Inclusion criteria | Description of study subject and setting | Valid and reliable measurement of exposure | Objective and standard criteria used | Identification of confounder | Strategies to handle confounder | Appropriate Outcome measurement | Appropriate statistical analysis | Over all appraisal | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R 1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R 1 | R2 | R 1 | R2 | R 1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1.Yeshaneh et al | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.8125 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2.Tufa et al | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.875 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3.Kiros et al | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.8125 | ||||||||||||||||||||
4.Girma et al | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.8125 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5.Feleke et al | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.9375 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6.Endale et al | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.875 | ||||||||||||||||||||
JBI Quality appraisal of included case-control study for growth monitoring and promotion service utilization in Ethiopia, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If Yes(> = 50%)…‥low risk(two raters)…‥>1 = Yes 2 = No 3 = Unclear | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Included study | Group comparable among presence of disease in case and absence of disease in control | Case and control matched appropriately | Similar criteria used for case and control | Standard exposure measurement | Similar exposure measurement for case and control | Identify confounding factor | Strategies deal with confounding factor stated | Standard outcome measurement for case and control | Long period of interest for exposure | Appropriate statistical analysis | Over all appraisal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | R1 | R2 | ||||||||||||||||||
7.Dagne et al | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.85 |
Footnote, R1; Researcher 1, R2; Researcher 2