Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 20;32:117. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01292-0

Table 3.

Comparisons between intranasal dexmedetomidine and nitrous oxide. Patient and parent questionnaires and ED physician’s opinion are presented in this table. Continuous variables are presented using medians and IQRs. Categorical variables are presented using counts and percentages

Intranasal dexmedetomidine 50% Nitrous oxide p-value
Missing (n) Missing (n)
FPS-R by patient 5.5 (2–8) 8 4 (2–6) 15 0.048
FPS-R by parent 6 (2–8) 1 3 (1–7) 0 0.007
Same method acceptable in future /patient 52 (82.5%) 12 59 (88.1%) 7 0.46
Same method acceptable in future /parent 65 (91.5%) 3 70 (94.6%) 0 0.53
Parental satisfaction with the general management 1 1
1 = Not at all satisfied 0 0 0.094
2 = Not satisfied 3 (4.1%) 0
3 = Neutral 6 (8.2%) 4 (5.5%)
4 = Satisfied 19 (26.0%) 12 (16.4%)
5 = Very satisfied 45 (61.6%) 57 (78.1%)
Feasibility by ED physician 0 0
1 = Very easy 42 (56.8%) 44 (59.5%) 0.66
2 = Easy 16 (21.6%) 19 (25.7%)
3 = Neutral 10 (13.5%) 9 (12.2%)
4 = Difficult 4 (5.4%) 2 (2.7%)
5 = Very difficult 2 (2.7%) 0

Abbreviations FPS-R = Faces Pain Scale revised, ED = Emergency Department