Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 2;156(2):280–292. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35154

TABLE 4.

Use of MHT after diagnosis and ovarian cancer‐specific survival among women ≤55 years at diagnosis (n = 259).

All (n = 259) HGSC (n = 143) LGSC & END (n = 59) Other histotypes (n = 57)
MHT use Total (n, %) Deaths (n, %) HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI)
MHT use time‐varying
No NA b NA b 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Yes NA b NA b 0.73 (0.41–1.31) 0.92 (0.46–1.83) 1.28 (0.22–7.27) 0.04 (0.004–0.30)
MHT use a
No 214 (83) 85 (86) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Yes 45 (17) 14 (14) 0.89 (0.49–1.62) 1.04 (0.51–2.14) 1.29 (0.18–8.98) 0.11 (0.01–1.14)
MHT changea
Never 200 (77) 81 (82) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Use prior to diagnosis only 14 (5) 4 (4) 0.64 (0.22–1.84) 0.31 (0.07–1.33) NA 1.40 (0.15–13.5)
Continuous use 8 (3) 4 (4) 0.76 (0.27–2.12) 0.71 (0.25–2.01) NA NA
New use 37 (14) 10 (10) 0.84 (0.43–1.64) 0.84 (0.35–2.01) 1.44 (0.21–9.78) 0.11 (0.01–1.16)

Note: Models adjusted for age (continuous), body mass index (<25, 25–29, 30+ kg/m2), smoking (never, former, current), FIGO Stage (I & II, III & IV), residual disease (none, any) and further adjusted for pre‐diagnosis MHT use (yes, no) except for the analysis of MHT change.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MHT: menopausal hormone therapy.

a

MHT use during the first year after diagnosis.

b

Time‐varying.

c

The models did not converge due to an insufficient number of samples.