Table 4.
Mean ± standard deviation of erosive tooth loss analyzed by 3D confocal microscopy, according to condition and treatment groups (n = 8).
| Groups | Cross-sectional loss area (µm2) | Volume of tissue loss (µm3) |
|---|---|---|
| (1) TiF4 + Water | 0.035 ± 0.01aA | 0.067 ± 0.01aA |
| (2) TiF4 + Soft drink | 0.036 ± 0.01aA | 0.075 ± 0.02aA |
| (3) NaF + Water | 0.040 ± 0.01aA | 0.072 ± 0.01aB |
| (4) NaF + Soft drink | 0.044 ± 0.01aB | 0.077 ± 0.01aA |
| (5) Placebo + Water | 0.041 ± 0.01aA | 0.080 ± 0.01aC |
| (6) Placebo + Soft drink | 0.063 ± 0.01bC | 0.111 ± 0.01bB |
* Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between soft drink and water (“conditions”) for each treatment. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between treatments (TiF4, NaF and placebo) for each condition (two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test, p < 0.0001 for conditions, treatments and interaction for cross-sectional area; two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test, p = 0.004, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.008 for conditions, treatments and interaction between factors for volume analysis, n = 8).