Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 21;19:167. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02544-0

Table 2.

Base case analysis

Treatment arm Cost (USD) QALYs Increased cost (USD) Increased QALYs ICER (USD/QALY) NMB (USD)
SOC vs. SOC + RT (20 fractions RT)
Only NRLN metastases SOC 154,788 2.89 -10,312

SOC + RT

(20 fractions)

180,886 3.81 26,098 0.92 28,452 9,453
 ≤ 3 bone metastases SOC 173,899 3.24 -12,078

SOC + RT

(20 fractions)

327,389 7.07 153,490 3.83 40,032 26,144
 ≥ 4 bone metastases SOC 195,501 3.44 14,862 0.03 478,797 -23,539

SOC + RT

(20 fractions)

180,639 3.41 -10,230
SOC vs. SOC + RT (6 fractions RT)
Only NRLN metastases SOC 154,788 2.89 -10,312
SOC + RT (6 fractions) 176,188 3.81 21,400 0.92 23,261 14,312
 ≤ 3 bone metastases SOC 173,899 3.24 -12,078
SOC + RT (6 fractions) 322,691 7.07 148,792 3.83 38,849 30,809
 ≥ 4 bone metastases SOC 195,501 3.44 19,559 0.03 615,967 -23,539
SOC + RT (6 fractions) 175,941 3.41 -10,230

Results of the cost-effectiveness analysis. For only NRLN metastases SOC + RT was associated with an ICER of USD 28,452 (20 fractions RT) and USD 23,261 (6 fractions RT). For ≤ 3 bone metastases SOC + RT was associated with an ICER of USD 40,032 (20 fractions RT) and USD 38,849 (6 fractions RT). WTP was set to USD 100,000/QALY. The difference in price of the costs of RT with 20 fractions and 6 fractions equals to USD 4,698 for each subgroup.