Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 21;13:56. doi: 10.1186/s40035-024-00449-2

Table 3.

Comparison of performance between SAA and QSAA

SAA QSAA QSAA in situ
Incubation mode Sonication/shaking Quiescent Quiescent
Cyclic Cyclic fragmentation One-step amplification One-step amplification
Detection device Fluorescence-plate-reader Real-time PCR instruments Incubator
Reaction vessel 96-well plate 96-well PCR plate 24-well plate
Substrate type Human αSyn (WT/mutant) monomer Mouse αSyn monomer Mouse αSyn monomer
Substrate concentration 0.1–1.0 mg/ml 1.0 mg/ml 1.0 mg/ml
AS addition None 10% w/v AS 10% w/v AS
Beads addition Silicon/zirconia beads None None
Reaction temperature 30–42 ℃ 70 ℃ 70 ℃
Sample type Liquid Liquid Slices
Incubation duration 24–120 h 6–24 h 6–24 h
Reaction volume 100 μl/well 20 μl/well 200 μl/well
Oil seal None Paraffin oil Paraffin oil
Fluorescent dye ThT ThT ThT
ThT concentration 5 μM 30 μM 30 μM
Quantitative data Lag phase/Fmax Lag phase/Fmax Fluorescence graph
Detection limit (PFFs) Attograms Femtograms Femtograms
Amplification mechanism Nucleation, elongation Secondary nucleation, elongation Secondary nucleation, elongation

SAA, seed aggregation assay; QSAA, quiescent aeed aggregation assay; AS, ammonium sulfate