Figure 13.

Three types of detachment architecture described from the Cyclades. (a) Typical Cycladic‐style low‐angle ductile‐then‐brittle detachment. Finite strain intensity increases toward the hanging wall, with late cataclasis and knife‐sharp faulting localized at the upper contact. A second, younger ductile‐then‐brittle detachment develops due to heating from syn‐tectonic intrusions. Detachment architecture described in Jolivet et al. (2010) and Grasemann et al. (2012). (b) Paired co‐active detachment branches like those described at Mt. Hymmitos. Detachment architecture develops coevally, with each exhibiting its own ductile‐then‐brittle finite strain evolution. Described in Coleman et al. (2020). (c) Detachment architecture as described in this study for the Evia Shear Zone, with a down‐section intensification of ductile finite strain, involving a flattening component, and cataclastic deformation localized along the upper contact with the hanging wall. Competent phacoids record lower finite strain than the surrounding matrix.