Abstract
Background
Targeted radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled small conjugates is expanding rapidly, and its success is linked to appropriate patient selection. Companion diagnostic conjugates are usually labelled with 68Ga, offering good imaging up to ≈2 h post-injection. However, the optimal tumor-to-background ratio is often reached later. This study examined promising positron-emitting radiometals with half-lives between 3 h and 24 h and β+ intensity (Iβ+) ≥ 15% and compared them to 68Ga. The radiometals included: 43Sc, 44Sc, 45Ti, 55Co, 61Cu, 64Cu, 66Ga, 85mY, 86Y, 90Nb, 132La, 150Tb and 152Tb. 133La (7.2% Iβ+) was also examined because it was recently discussed, in combination with 132La, as a possible diagnostic match for 225Ac.
Methods
Total electron and photon doses per decay and per positron; possibly interfering γ-ray emissions; typical activities to be injected for same-day imaging; positron range; and available production routes were examined.
Results
For each annihilation process useful for PET imaging, the total energy released (MeV) is: 45Ti (1.5), 43Sc (1.6), 61Cu and 64Cu (1.8), 68Ga (1.9), 44Sc and 133La (2.9), 55Co (3.2), 85mY (3.3), 132La (4.8), 152Tb (6.5), 150Tb (7.1), 90Nb (8.6), and 86Y (13.6). Significant amounts (≥ 10%) of ≈0.5 MeV photons that may fall into the acceptance window of PET scanners are emitted by 55Co, 66Ga, 85mY, 86Y, 132La, and 152Tb. Compton background from more energetic photons would be expected for 44Sc, 55Co, 66Ga, 86Y, 90Nb, 132La,150Tb, and 152Tb. The mean positron ranges (mm) of 64Cu (0.6), 85mY (1.0), 45Ti (1.5), 133La (1.6), 43Sc and 61Cu (1.7), 55Co (2.1), 44Sc and 86Y (2.5), and 90Nb (2.6) were lower than that of 68Ga (3.6). DOTA chelation is applicable for most of the radiometals, though not ideal for 61Cu/64Cu. Recent data showed that chelation of 45Ti with DOTA is feasible. 90Nb requires different complexing agents (e.g., DFO). Finally, they could be economically produced by proton-induced reactions at medical cyclotrons.
Conclusion
In particular, 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu have overall excellent β+ decay-characteristics for theranostic applications complementing 177Lu-labelled small conjugates, and they could be sustainably produced. Like Lu, 43Sc, 45Ti and to a lesser extent 61Cu could be labelled with DOTA.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-024-00699-z.
Keywords: PET, Theranostics, 43Sc, 45Ti, 61Cu
Introduction
The field of targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is undergoing significant expansion. Many successful TRT applications are based on small conjugates such as radiopeptides and other small radioligands. Impressive results were recently obtained with the somatostatin analog [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors [1] and with 177Lu-labeled PSMA ligands in prostate cancer [2, 3]. The application of TRT is rapidly expanding thanks to the synthesis of novel conjugates aimed at various targets on tumor cells or in the tumor microenvironment [4, 5]. The radionuclide is often a radiometal linked to the targeting molecule by a chelating agent (e.g. DOTA). β--emitters such as 177Lu are the most widely used, while α-emitters (e.g., 225Ac) are also currently being studied.
Selecting appropriate patients for TRT is achieved by using a companion molecule labeled with a positron-emitting radionuclide for imaging with positron emission tomography (PET). Imaging provides information on disease extension and receptor expression. It can also inform the pharmacokinetics of the targeting molecule, which predicts both the success of TRT and the radiation dose to critical organs. The choice of the positron-emitting radionuclide is thus important because its chemical properties affect both labeling and biological behavior, and its physical properties determine which information PET imaging can provide or which radionuclide enables novel perspectives such as positronium imaging based on triple coincidences².
68Ga, which jump-started the development of theranostic applications, has advantages as well as limitations. Its 68-minute half-life is only adequate for imaging at 1–2 h post-injection, even though more extended imaging may be useful for increasing detection sensitivity and tumor-to-background ratio, even for small conjugates [6]. Later imaging is also needed when pre-therapy dosimetry to tumors and critical organs (e.g. kidneys, liver, bone marrow) would be useful. The half-life of a 68Ga-labeled companion diagnostic molecule is too short to correctly model the retention and clearance kinetics of the therapy conjugate [7]. In addition, not all nuclear medicine departments are equipped with 68Ge/68Ga generators. Storage and long-distance transit coverage of 68Ga-labeled tracers are difficult because of its relatively short half-life. Finally, due to differences in chemistry 68Ga-labelling does not always offer a good match with the 177Lu-counterpart.
Because alternatives to 68Ga could help the field, this study investigated PET radiometals that might be suited for imaging small conjugates for theranostic applications.
Materials and methods
A systematic selection of positron emitters was made based on the nuclear data available in NuDat (https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat); all nuclides with positron intensity per decay (Iβ+) of at least 15% and half-lives between 3 h and 24 h were selected. From this list, the following were removed: the non-metals 73Se, 76Br, and 120I; the alkali metals 81Rb and 82mRb because in-vivo-stable chelation would be challenging; and 90Mo because it decays to another positron emitter, 90Nb, with the risk of loss of labelling or change in biodistribution. Although it only exhibits ~ 7% Iβ+, 133La was also added because it has been discussed, together with 132La, as a possible diagnostic match for 225Ac. All the investigated radiometals were compared to 68Ga.
The following variables were examined for all nuclides: total electron and photon emissions; possibly interfering γ-ray emissions; positron range; energy released per decay (taken from https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/mird) and per positron (normalization to Iβ+); typical activities to be injected for same day imaging; and corresponding energy. Production options for the radionuclides that best fit these criteria were then carefully analyzed. Table 1 lists the most promising nuclides (43Sc, 45Ti, 61Cu, 64Cu). The other nuclides (44Sc, 55Co, 66Ga, 85mY, 86Y, 90Nb, 132La, 133La, 150Tb, and 152Tb) are listed in Table S1. Of note, some of the production routes of 43Sc lead to concomitant production of 44Sc (43Sc + 44Sc; 2:1 mixture) which was also examined.
Table 1.
Physical properties of the selected positron-emitting radionuclides
68 Ga | 43 Sc ¥ |
43
Sc +
44
Sc
(2:1 mixture) £ |
45 Ti | 61 Cu | 64 Cu | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T 1/2 (h) | 1.13 | 3.89 | 3.9 | 3.08 | 3.34 | 12.70 | |
β + branching ratio (% emission) | 88.9 | 88.0 | 90 | 84.8 | 61 | 17.5 | |
E β+ mean (keV) | 830 | 476 | 580 | 439 | 500 | 278 | |
E β+ max (keV) | 1899 | 1199 | 1474 | 1028 | 1216 | 653 | |
Mean positron range (Rmean, mm)Þ | 3.6 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.56 | |
Dominant γ rays E (keV) [I γ (%)] | 1077 [3.22] | 373 [22.5] |
373 [15] 1157 [33] |
- |
283 [12.7] 656 [9.7] |
- | |
511 keV ± 10% (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | |
511 keV ± 20% (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | |
1022 keV ± 10% (%) | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | |
1022 keV ± 20% (%) | 3.2 | 0.0 | 33 | 0.0 | 5.6 | 0.0 | |
> 613 keV (Compton background, %) | 3.6 | 0.0 | 34 | 0.3 | 16.7 | 0.5 | |
> 1500 keV (pair creation background, %) | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | |
H10 (at 1 m, µSv/h/GBq) | 158 | 165 | 220 | 146 | 136 | 31 | |
Dose rate after 5 cm Pb (at 1 m, µSv/h/GBq) | 0.36 | 0.05 | 3.3 | 0.07 | 0.65 | 0.09 |
All nuclides decay by β+ and electron capture. 64Cu emits additional β− radiation (39.0%). ¥Pure 43Sc when produced using α-beams. £43Sc + 44Sc (2:1 mixture is obtained when 43Sc is produced using proton beams. ÞCalculated with a Monte Carlo code for 68Ga, 43Sc, 45Ti and 64Cu and estimated using the equation of Cole and colleagues for other radionuclides [9]
Energy release and gamma ray emissions
The intensities of gamma ray emissions were extracted from the ENSDF database and summed over different intervals of interest: 460–562 keV (i.e., falling into a ±10% wide energy window around the 511 keV annihilation rays), and 409–613 keV (i.e., falling into a ±20% wide window around 511 keV). Similarly, γ-rays in the energy windows 920–1124 keV and 818–1226 keV (i.e., within ± 10% or ± 20% of 2 × 511 keV) could give rise to Compton background when backscattering in a detector, leaving roughly half of their energy there. Any γ-ray above the 511 keV window could still fall into this window after undergoing Compton scattering. To address this issue, all γ-rays above 613 keV were integrated. Finally, pair creation for very energetic γ-rays may generate virtual secondary positron sources far from the primary source; because the probability of pair creation rises strongly with energy, all γ-rays above 1500 keV were considered.
Positron range
A higher tissue penetration of positrons, from emission until annihilation with electrons, degrades the resolution of the PET image. Positron range values in water (tissue equivalent) were obtained for 68Ga, 43Sc, 44Sc, 45Ti, 61Cu, 64Cu, 86Y, and 152Tb with a Monte Carlo code described in [8]. Our code takes into account the whole positron energy spectrum, has very low transport cut-off energy (7.4 eV), and included modeling of positronium formation and diffusion. Positron ranges of other radionuclides were estimated using the empirical formula described in [9].
Imaging/measurement possibilities at specific time points
In order to assess the possibility of same-day imaging, a body content of activity was assumed at the time of imaging, providing 50 million annihilations/s needed for high-sensitivity imaging. The activity in GBq necessary at injection to achieve this rate of events at a given time point was calculated, considering the positron branching ratio (Iβ+) of the radionuclide and the biological half-life of PSMA-617 [10]. The corresponding energy released in J (dosimetry estimate) was also calculated.
External dose rates
The gamma dose rates associated with different positron emitters are generally not considered a primary selection criterion. Nevertheless, for large-scale deployment of novel radionuclides, gamma dose rate could impact the collective dose of personnel involved in the chain of production to administration, and ALARA aspects should thus be considered. Gamma dose rates (in µSv/h) were calculated at 1 m distance from a point source, assuming two locally-created annihilation photons per emitted positron. The calculations were performed with the Nucleonica online tool (https://www.nucleonica.com) based on nuclear data from the ENDF8.0 library. These results were compared with Nucleonica calculations based on nuclear data from the JEFF3.3 library, as well as with H10 values [11], which in turn were calculated with FLUKA based on nuclear data from ICRP107. No suitable nuclear data were available from JEFF3.3 for 85mY, nor from ENDF8.0 and JEFF3.3 for 150Tb. γ-dose rates are given for 1 m distance, once without photon shielding and once behind a 5 cm lead shield (broad beam geometry including buildup, representative for lead-shielded transport containers or hot cells).
Production routes for selected radionuclides
Production yields were calculated with the IAEA Medical Isotope Browser (https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/isotopia/isotopia.html). Typical energy ranges (incident projectile energy and energy when leaving the target) were chosen to cover roughly the full-width-half-maximum of the excitation curve for the radionuclide of interest. When radionuclide impurities produced in other reaction channels needed to be minimized, the energy range was constrained accordingly. A typical production run was assumed to last for one half-life of the nuclide of interest (i.e., reaching 50% of saturation activity) at an incident beam current of 50µA (or 50 electrical µA for α beams, respectively). A delay of 4 h between the end of irradiation and injection was assumed, allowing for chemical separation, labelling, and shipment. A combined separation and labelling yield of 80% was assumed.
Caveats related to our methodology are described in the Supplement.
Results
As described in greater detail below, radionuclides were selected based on γ-ray and electron emissions, late imaging possibilities, dose rates, and positron range. Data for the four selected PET radionuclides (43Sc (pure or as mixture), 45Ti, 61Cu, 64Cu) are shown in Table 1, and data for the additional 10 PET radionuclides (44Sc, 55Co, 66Ga, 85mY, 86Y, 90Nb, 132La, 133La, 150Tb, 152Tb) are available in Tables S1 and S2.
Energy released per decay or per emitted Positron and Gamma Ray Emissions
The total amount of energy released from electron or photon radiation was calculated, normalized per annihilation process. The values for the four selected radionuclides were: 43Sc (~ 1.6 MeV), 45Ti (~ 1.5 MeV), 61Cu (~ 1.8 MeV), and 64Cu (~ 1.8 MeV); in comparison, the value for 68Ga is ~ 1.9 MeV (Table 2). Separate values are provided for electron radiation (ß+, ß-, conversion electrons, Auger electrons), considered to be fully absorbed in the patient, and for photons (partially absorbed) (Table 2). Most of the radionuclides that were not selected had higher values (86Y had the highest value (~ 13.6 MeV) (Table S2)). Importantly, 43Sc, 45Ti, and 64Cu had no γ-emissions that fell into the 511 keV window of PET machines. In addition, 43Sc had no, and 45Ti and 64Cu had almost no (≤ 0.5%), higher energy γ-emissions capable of interfering with imaging after Compton scattering. 61Cu had a slightly increased potential Compton background compared to 68Ga. A mixture of 43Sc and 44Sc resulting from certain production routes would have similar drawbacks as 44Sc—that is, the 1157 keV γ-ray source of Compton background but at much lower intensity than pure 44Sc. The other radionuclides are discussed in the Supplement.
Table 2.
Energy released from electron radiation (ß+, ß−, conversion electrons, Auger electrons) and photons including annihilation photons
Radionuclides (half life, positron branching) |
Electron energy (MeV)
(including β+, β−, CE, Auger) |
Photon energy (MeV)
(γ + X rays + annihilation photons) |
Total electron + photon energy (MeV)
(including annihilation photons) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
per disintegration | normalized per annihilation process ¤ | per disintegration | normalized per annihilation process ¤ | per disintegration | normalized per annihilation process ¤ | |
68Ga (1.13 h, 88.9%) | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
43Sc (3.89 h, 88.0%) | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
43Sc +44Sc 2:1 mixture (3.4 h, 90%) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.0 |
45Ti (3.08 h, 84.8%) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
61Cu (3.34 h, 61%) | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
64Cu (12.70 h, 17.5%) | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.8 |
Positron range
As seen in Table 1, 43Sc, 45Ti, 61Cu, and 64Cu outperformed 68Ga in terms of smaller Rmean (mm): 64Cu (~ 0.6), 45Ti (~ 1.5), 43Sc and 61Cu (~ 1.7), 43Sc + 44Sc as 2:1 mixture (~ 2.0), versus 68Ga (~ 3.6). See Table S1 for the Rmean values of the other radionuclides.
Possibility of same-day imaging and energy released
For each of the selected radionuclides, the activity in GBq that needed to be injected for imaging at specific time points (considering that a rate of 50 million annihilations/s is required for high-sensitivity imaging) is shown in Table 3; Table S3 displays activity for the other radionuclides. The corresponding total energy released is also depicted in Table 3. 43Sc and the 43Sc + 44Sc mixture enabled high resolution imaging using low activity (Table 3). Nevertheless, the higher activity needed for 45Ti and 61Cu may not be prohibitive because the total energy released was comparable or even slightly lower than for 43Sc and the 43Sc + 44Sc mixture (Table 3). In all cases, 64Cu needed higher activity and released higher amounts of energy.
Table 3.
Required activity for same day imaging based on the biological half-life of PSMA-617 and total energy released
Radionuclide, half-life; β+ branching ratio | 68Ga, 1.13 h; 88.9% | 43Sc, 3.89 h; 88.0% | 43Sc +44Sc 2:1 mixture, 3.9 h, 90% | 45Ti, 3.08 h; 84.8% | 61Cu, 3.34 h; 61% | 64Cu, 12.70 h; 17.5% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Activity needed (GBq) to obtain 50 million annihilation events/s for high sensitivity imaging | 1 h | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.40 | |
2 h | 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.55 | ||
4 h | 1.6 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.89 | ||
6 h | 7.1 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 1.3 | ||
8 h | 28 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
Energy released (J, total energy/electron energy) for same day imaging | 1 h | 0.2/0.1 | 0.4/0.1 | 0.5/0.1 | 0.3/0.1 | 0.4/0.1 | 1.3/0.5 | |
2 h | 0.5/0.2 | 0.6/0.2 | 0.8/0.2 | 0.5/0.1 | 0.7/0.2 | 1.8/0.7 | ||
4 h | 2.6/1.1 | 1.3/0.4 | 1.7/0.4 | 1.1/0.3 | 1.5/0.4 | 2.9/1.2 | ||
6 h | 11/5 | 2.4/0.7 | 3.1/0.8 | 2.3/0.7 | 2.8/0.8 | 4.2/1.7 | ||
8 h | 44/19 | 3.9/1.2 | 5.0/1.3 | 4.1/1.2 | 4.9/1.4 | 5.4/2.1 |
External dose rates
In line with their γ-emission properties, pure 43Sc, 45Ti, and 64Cu exhibited 4-7-fold lower dose rates than 68Ga behind 5 cm lead shielding, while 61Cu had a slightly higher dose rate than 68Ga (Table 1). The 43Sc + 44Sc 2:1 mixture had a 9-fold higher dose rate than 68Ga. With the exception of 133La, the other radionuclides exhibited much higher (22-fold to 150-fold) dose rates than 68Ga behind 5 cm shielding (Table S1). Results from all three calculations (Nucleonica with ENDF8.0, Nucleonica with JEFF3.3, and FLUKA with ICRP107) were generally within ±2%, with the exception of some heavier radionuclides with discrepant γ-ray intensities in the libraries (132La, 133La, 152Tb), which showed differences up to 10% unshielded and up to one-third with 5 cm lead shielding. It should be noted that, because recent detailed measurements of 86Y decay [12] are not yet included in any of the databases used, the present calculations likely underestimate the γ-dose rate for 86Y.
Production routes
Because 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu performed better than 68Ga in terms of γ-ray emissions, possibility of same-day imaging, dose rates, and positron range, their production routes were carefully analyzed and compared. 61Cu production was also compared to the well-known production routes of 64Cu (Table 4). Additional information is provided below for each radionuclide.
Table 4.
Production routes, yields, and natural abundance of precursor for the production of 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu
43Sc | 45Ti | 61Cu | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reaction | 43Ca(p, n)43Sc | 44Ca(p,2n)43Sc | 46Ti(p,α)43Sc | 40Ca(α,p)43Sc | 45Sc(p, n)45Ti | 61Ni(p, n)61Cu | 62Ni(p,2n)61Cu | 64Zn(p,α)61Cu | 60Ni(d, n)61Cu |
Ein > Eout (MeV) | 13 > 8 | 30 > 18 | 18 > 12 | 20 > 10 | 13 > 8 | 13 > 8 | 30 > 18 | 18 > 10 | 13 > 8 |
Production yield (GBq/µAh) | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 0.27 | 0.33 |
Natural abundance of precursor (%) | 0.14 | 2.1 | 8.3 | 96.9 | 100 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 49.2 | 26.2 |
43Sc: 43Sc can be produced by proton-irradiation of enriched calcium targets in 43Ca(p,n) and 44Ca(p,2n) reactions, respectively. The radiochemical Ca/Sc separation has previously been described [13]. Commercially available grades of enriched 43Ca contain between 58% and 87% 43Ca with significant 44Ca admixture, inevitably leading to co-production of some 44Sc via the 44Ca(p,n)44Sc reaction. Target material containing 58% 43Ca and 12% 44Ca leads to a 43Sc/44Sc activity ratio of about 2:1 [14]. The 44Ca(p,2n)43Sc reaction uses 44Ca targets that are available with high enrichment (> 95%). However, any (p,2n) reaction is inevitably accompanied by the (p,n) channel. In the present case, the 44Ca(p,n)44Sc reaction leads to co-production of 44Sc. Irradiation of 100% enriched 44Ca over the energy range 30 to 18 MeV would lead to co-production of 43Sc and 44Sc at an activity ratio of about 4:1 and, at lower energies, the fraction of 44Sc increases. Considering the batch yield and the lower cost of enriched 44Ca (due to higher natural abundance), the 44Ca(p,2n)43Sc reaction appears preferential for centralized production of large quantities of 43Sc compared to the 43Ca(p,n)43Sc reaction.
The 46Ti(p,α)43Sc reaction exploiting enriched titanium targets has a much lower yield than the calcium routes but provides purer 43Sc, with less contribution of 44Sc. Target material containing 97% 46Ti and 0.44% 47Ti leads to a 43Sc/44Sc activity ratio of about 65:1 (i.e., 98.2% pure 43Sc) [14]. Because the maximum current density compatible with metallic titanium targets is higher than calcium oxide (or calcium carbonate) targets [13, 15], part of the lower yield could be made up with a higher current. Enriched 46Ti targets are considerably cheaper than 43Ca targets due to the significantly higher natural abundance than 43Ca and because volatile titanium compounds are available for centrifuge enrichment; in contrast, calcium is enriched electromagnetically, which is more costly. Reducing the 43Ca target mass to match the cost of an enriched 46Ti target would invert the yield advantage, making the titanium route favorable. Thus, except for the challenge of efficiently recycling and reducing enriched Ti targets, the 46Ti(p,α) route with 18 MeV or 19 MeV cyclotrons appears overall preferable to the 43Ca(p,n) route—though not necessarily preferable to the 44Ca(p,2n) route.
Two alternatives should be mentioned for cyclotrons that provide other projectiles than protons. First, the 42Ca(d,n)43Sc route using 9 MeV deuterons can provide local supply [16]. Second, the 40Ca(α,p)43Sc route provides extremely pure 43Sc when (cheap) enriched 40Ca targets are used and retains over 99.9% radionuclidic purity when Ca targets of natural isotopic composition are used [17]. This would indeed be the preferred method for producing “pure” 43Sc if more accelerators providing suitable (> 20 MeV) α-beams were available.
61Cu: 61Cu can be produced by proton-irradiation of enriched nickel targets in 61Ni(p,n)61Cu and 62Ni(p,2n)61Cu reactions, respectively. All aspects of targetry, radiochemical Cu separation and purification, and Ni target recycling are identical to the well-known 64Ni(p,n)64Cu reaction, and commercial solutions with automated synthesis modules are available for this purpose [18].
The yield of the 61Ni(p,n)61Cu reaction is over two times as large as that of the 64Ni(p,n)64Cu reaction over the relevant energy range (13 MeV to 8 MeV). Combined with the 3.5-fold higher positron intensity of the 61Cu decay, this shorter-lived copper radioisotope is clearly advantageous in terms of production capacity (patient doses per production batch). However, for decay times exceeding 13 h (between end-of-target irradiation and imaging), the longer-lived 64Cu is favorable due to lower decay losses. The costs of enriched 61Ni and 64Ni targets are comparable because the natural abundance of both isotopes is comparable. Local or regional production of 61Cu can thus be cost-effective compared to centralized production of 64Cu when used for same-day imaging.
The 62Ni(p,2n)61Cu reaction provides another factor 2 gain in production yield with respect to 61Ni(p,n)61Cu, but it requires larger cyclotrons providing incident proton beams of 24 to 30 MeV. With rising demand for 61Cu, this pathway could provide a cost-efficient regional supply for same-day imaging.
The 60Ni(d,n)61Cu route profits from the high natural abundance of the target isotope but requires deuteron beams only available with some cyclotrons. Although ≈13 MeV deuterons would provide the highest yields, 8–9 MeV deuteron beams may provide useful quantities for local or regional use.
The 64Zn(p,α)61Cu reaction could be well served with 18 MeV cyclotrons but has about four-fold lower yield than the 61Ni(p,n)61Cu reaction. Its main advantage is the use of very affordable enriched 64Zn targets that do not require recycling compared to the costly Ni targets. This reaction can also be used with cheap Zn targets of natural composition, leading to > 97% radionuclidic purity at the end of bombardment (co-production of about 2% 64Cu and 0.02% 67Cu activity), which remains acceptable for most applications.
In all these reactions, some co-production of short-lived 62Cu and/or 60Cu may occur, but a decay time of 1–2 h between end of bombardment and injection suffices to let these decay to negligible levels. In practice, the duration of processing and shipment will usually provide such a decay time.
45Ti: 45Ti is best produced by proton-irradiation of naturally monoisotopic scandium targets in 45Sc(p,n)45Ti reactions. Production and separation of GBq quantities are discussed in detail in [19]. Other proton- or α-induced reactions are less competitive in terms of yield, target, and accelerator costs.
Discussion
Although many positron-emitting radionuclides have become available in recent years, each with its own physical and chemical advantages and disadvantages, the optimal radiometals for theranostic applications remain uncertain. This comparative analysis sought to identify a preferred diagnostic radionuclide analog for 177Lu for theranostic applications using small bioconjugates requiring same-day imaging. It also explored the utility of these positron-emitting radiometals for other diagnostic purposes.
Many diagnostic conjugates (e.g., PSMA ligands, somatostatin analogs, albumin-binding modified ligands, affibodies, nanobodies, etc.) achieve optimal tumor-to-background ratio at 3–4 h post-injection or later [20–22], but such imaging time requires substantially higher activities of 68Ga (> 300 MBq). In contrast, the half-lives of 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu (~ 3–4 h) are well-suited to later imaging times. The injected activities calculated here for optimal imaging were PSMA-617-specific and based on studies done with conventional PET scanners. New, more sensitive PET machines (digital PET, and more recently long-axial field-of-view PET) will need less activity for all radionuclides and/or would allow imaging at later time points [23]. Pending confirmatory studies in humans, the dose delivered to patients by 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu is likely to be more advantageous than that of 68Ga because of their lower positron energy and lower intensity of photon emissions (Table 1). Importantly, the energy absorbed by patients (electron energy) for activities required for imaging at any time point between 2 h and 8 h was lower with 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu than with 68Ga. A recent modelling study confirmed the lower mean effective dose of [43Sc]Sc-DOTATATE vs. [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE as early as 2 h assuming injected activity reported in Table 3 [24]. [61Cu]Cu-NODAGA-PSMA I&T has also been recently applied in a patient with metastatic prostate cancer. Only 105 MBq were injected and high-contrast imaging was possible 3 h post-injection [25]. 64Cu had higher energy released in the form of electrons than 68Ga up to 4 h due to its competing β- decay mode. Another specific advantage of 43Sc and 61Cu was that the co-emitted photons (373 keV for 43Sc and 283/656 keV for 61Cu) had moderate intensity and did not fall into the acceptable window of PET scanners (Table 1). Here, 45Ti, as well as 64Cu, might be even more suited as they had almost no co-emitted photons (≤ 0.5%). Lastly, as regards radiation safety, the dose rates for 43Sc, 45Ti, 61Cu, and 64Cu behind 5 cm lead shielding were in the same order of magnitude as 68Ga or even lower, suggesting easy implementation of these radionuclides to already equipped PET centers.
43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu had similar positron ranges (1.5–1.7 mm) with values less than half that of 68Ga (3.6 mm). Smaller positron ranges and fewer photon emissions should result in better image quality and resolution with 43Sc compared to 44Sc, which has been documented on Derenzo phantoms imaged with small-animal PET [14, 26]. 45Ti also provided excellent resolution down to 1.25 mm spheres from Derenzo phantoms [27]. 61Cu offered better spatial resolution than 68Ga in Jaszczak phantoms [28]. Overall, 43Sc (pure or mixed with 44Sc), 45Ti, and 61Cu are expected to provide images with higher spatial resolution than 68Ga. Because the intrinsic resolution of small-animal PET scanners is now as low as ~ 1.5 mm, the positron range of 68Ga has become the limiting factor for spatial resolution and activity recovery in small structures [29, 30]. The resolution of clinical whole-body PET systems is lower (~ 4–5 mm) [31], but with the advent of silicon-photomultiplier-based PET technology and other developments, the impact of positron range on clinical PET imaging is expected to be more prominent [32].
For certain radiometals the positron emission is followed within few picoseconds by the emission of prompt γ-rays. When the latter are of suitable energy and intensity this combination can be exploited for new imaging technologies such as positronium imaging [33], 3γ imaging [34], or multiplexed PET [35], which are based on triple coincidence events (2 annihilation photons + 1 prompt photon). Among the radiometals investigated in this study, in particular 44Sc, 55Co and 86Y qualify for such an application. The quantification of positronium formation, a bound electron-positron pair, has not yet been utilized in routine clinical applications of PET due to the need to detect either the emission of a prompt γ-ray or the decay of higher-order coincident events. This point deserves specific considerations as positronium imaging might offer new horizons in PET imaging [36–39]. As described by Moskal et al. [36–38], positronium is copiously formed in the free molecular spaces in the patient’s body during PET imaging. Assessment of the lifetime of the formed positronium can potentially yield additional diagnostic information of the surrounding tissue. The positronium properties vary according to the size of inter- and intramolecular voids and the concentration of molecules in them such as, e.g., molecular oxygen, O2; therefore, positronium imaging may provide information about disease progression during the initial stages of molecular alterations. Measurement of positronium lifetime is feasible using dedicated devices such as the Jagiellonian (J) -PET [36–38], but also on long-axial field-of-view PET scanners [39]. The use of the triple co-incidence imaging has been also used in simultaneous multi-tracer imaging [38, 40]. The use of radiometals emitting copious amount of prompt γ-rays is beneficial for these specific applications [41], the increase of the absorbed dose should, however, be taken into account when used outside these perspectives, on conventional PET instruments for clinical routine (Table S3).
From a chemical standpoint, 43Sc-labeled and 177Lu-labeled molecules displayed excellent chemical and pharmacokinetic similarities, with direct implications for theranostic applications. Indeed, DOTA, the most widely used chelator for 177Lu (as well as for 90Y, 161Tb, and 225Ac), is also an excellent chelator for scandium [42, 43]. Previous preclinical investigations confirmed that Sc3+ was more compatible with Lu3+-labeled DOTA-functionalized bioconjugates than Ga3+ as exemplified with radiolabeled PSMA-inhibitors [44]. 43Sc-labelled molecules could thus be better suited to select patients who might benefit from 177Lu therapy and would also be an excellent theranostic match for 47Sc therapy when this β--emitting radionuclide becomes more available [45]. As regards Cu2+, it is a labile metal ion, and the optimal chelators for copper radioisotopes differ from those for 177Lu [42], although the DOTA chelator can be used for imaging between 1 and 3 h post-injection as reported with [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE [46]. A clinical study using [64Cu]Cu-PSMA-617 (DOTA chelator) clearly showed lower tumor uptake and higher liver uptake on next-day images, most probably due to demetallation [47]. Nevertheless, 61Cu-labeled bioconjugates can be used for 177Lu-pre-therapy imaging if the specific Cu-chelate does not too strongly impair the behavior of the radiopharmaceutical. This issue needs to be addressed in (pre)clinical studies. Indeed, 61Cu could be the ideal theranostic match for same-day PET imaging of the therapeutic β--emitter 67Cu [48]. 45Ti is a hard metal with high oxophilicity, low hydrolytic stability, and high propensity in forming titanyl species in aqueous environments for which the chelation chemistry have been under-investigated. Recently, chelation of 45Ti with DOTA became possible through the formation of an intermediate [45Ti]Ti-guaiacolate complex thus opening the door to the development of [45Ti]Ti-DOTA-radiopharmaceuticals [49]. 45Ti does not have a perfect theranostic match. Overall, 43Sc, 45Ti and 61Cu can be easily implemented in existing workflow regarding radiopharmaceutical supply chain although copper-specific chelators should be used for high-sensitivity imaging at late time points (4 to 8 h post-injection).
Selecting novel radionuclides only makes sense if production routes allow large-scale economic and sustainable availability. Only α beams can lead to pure 43Sc production but accelerators producing suitable > 20 MeV α beams are scarcely available. Unless a subsequent mass separation step is added after the irradiation step, none of the considered proton-induced production paths for 43Sc provides “pure” 43Sc, where “pure” is defined in the usual sense of > 99% or > 99.9% radionuclidic purity. However, in this specific case, the very similar decay properties of both 43Sc and 44Sc must be considered—that is, the latter is not a normal impurity but equally useful for PET imaging. Two-to-one mixtures of 43Sc and 44Sc have successfully been used, and corresponding doses are proportional to the mixture used [26].
As noted above, several promising production pathways exist for 61Cu that could be supplied at production costs potentially lower than those for 64Cu. Production and purification methods for GBq quantities of 45Ti were also discussed. However, it was not our objective to provide a market access study of 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu, but rather a comparative study of their characteristics. When a market-access study is needed before industrial development of these radionuclides, any such study would strongly depend on disease(s), vector(s), population characteristics, etc. that could eventually bias outcomes towards a shorter- or longer-lived radionuclide.
133La has recently been proposed as a novel PET radionuclide and deserves specific consideration. At first glance, 133La closely resembles 43Sc; in particular, their half-lives and their average positron energies and ranges are identical within reported uncertainties, and interfering γ-rays are relatively weak for both. However, the differences between these nuclides are significant. Chemically, Sc has the smallest ionic radius of all rare earth metals and thus more closely resembles Lu. On the other hand, La has the largest ionic radius of all lanthanides and thus provides a better match for Ac. Due to the very low positron intensity of 133La—more than an order of magnitude lower than that of 43Sc—higher activities need to be produced and injected to obtain the same annihilation event statistics (e.g., 3.5 GBq 133La versus 0.3 GBq 43Sc for an image after 4 h). Due to weak co-emission of other radiation, this high activity is not necessarily prohibitive in terms of patient dose—that is, the total dose per positron remains reasonable (1.5-fold the total dose from 68Ga; Table S2). However, one notable difference concerns long-lived residual activity; while 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu decay to stable nuclei, 133La decays to long-lived radioactive 133Ba. It should be noted that the presence of long-lived residual activity is not unique to this specific radionuclide, given that 99mTc decays to long-lived 99Tc, 131I is accompanied by tiny amounts of long-lived 129I, and all generator-derived radionuclides may be accompanied by a tiny but finite breakthrough of the mother isotope (68Ge, 82Sr, etc.). A detailed calculation of the contamination by 133Ba of 133La is provided in the Supplement.
Conclusion
This exploratory study suggests that 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu would be excellent radionuclides for theranostic applications or even routine clinical imaging. All three have the appealing possibility of sustainable production and distribution of radiopharmaceuticals within about one lifetime distance. Their half-lives, close to 4 h, also enable imaging at optimal time points for small ligands, such as peptides and small proteins. For imaging performed between 2 h and 8 h post-injection, patients’ dosimetry when using 43Sc, 61Cu, and 45Ti would be more favorable than 68Ga. Moreover, 43Sc and 61Cu can be perfectly paired with the β--emitters 47Sc and 67Cu. The low positron range and the absence of co-emitted photons that fall into the range detected by PET scanners suggest better image quality. Finally, production capability highlights that 43Sc, 45Ti, and 61Cu could make their way into routine clinical use in the near future. The chemistry of Sc-labeled bioconjugates is highly compatible with that of therapeutic 177Lu-labeled counterparts. Complexation of 61Cu and 45Ti is feasible with DOTA. The use of 133La might make sense as a specific 225Ac surrogate or with its perfect therapeutic match 135La (Auger electron emitter), but not as 177Lu surrogate nor for general same day PET imaging of small ligands. Finally, perspectives regarding positronium imaging with radionuclides emitting a prompt γ-ray are a novel and exciting domain.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded in part by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101008571 (PRISMAP). This work was conducted within the frame of the NEWMOOM Impulsion network of Bordeaux University. The comparison of the sustainability of different production paths has been performed by U.K. in the frame of the PRISMAP project. This study received financial support from the French government in the framework of the University of Bordeaux’s IdEx “Investments for the Future” program / GPR BRAIN_2030.
Author contributions
EH performed the modelling study of the positron ranges and was a major contributor in writing of the article. UK selected the positron-emitters, analyzed the production routes and external dose rates of the radionuclides and a major contributor in writing of the article. CC performed the modelling study of the positron ranges. PZF was a major contributor in writing the article and critically reviewed the manuscript. CM selected positron emitters, performed calculations of energy released and possibility of same day imaging and was a major contributor in writing the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded in part by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101008571 (PRISMAP). This work was conducted within the frame of the NEWMOOM Impulsion network of Bordeaux University. The comparison of the sustainability of different production paths has been performed by U.K. in the frame of the PRISMAP project.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose, financial or otherwise.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B, et al. Phase 3 trial of 177Lu-Dotatate for Midgut neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:125–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, et al. Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate Cancer. New Engl Med. 2021;385:1091–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Goh JC, et al. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:797–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Herrmann K, Schwaiger M, Lewis JS, Solomon SB, McNeil BJ, Baumann M, et al. Radiotheranostics: a roadmap for future development. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:e146–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aboagye EO, Barwick TD, Haberkorn U. Radiotheranostics in oncology: making precision medicine possible. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:255–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koehler D, Sauer M, Karimzadeh A, Apostolova I, Klutmann S, Adam G, et al. Evaluation of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT with additional late scans of the pelvis in prostate-specific antigen recurrence using the PROMISE criteria. EJNMMI Res. 2022;12:66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krebs S, O’Donoghue JA, Biegel E, Beattie BJ, Reidy D, Lyashchenko SK, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT with dosimetric 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan (177Lu-DOTA-JR11) SPECT/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:3047–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Champion C, Loirec CL. Positron follow-up in liquid water: I. A new Monte Carlo track-structure code. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:1707–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cole A. Absorption of 20-eV to 50,000-eV electron beams in air and plastic. Radiat Res. 1969;38:7–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kurth J, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Rahbar K. External radiation exposure, excretion, and effective half-life in 177Lu-PSMA-targeted therapies. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Otto T. Personal dose-equivalent conversion coefficients for 1252 radionuclides. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016;168:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gula AC, McCutchan EA, Lister CJ, Greene JP, Zhu S, Ellison PA, et al. State-of-the-art γ-ray assay of 86Y for medical imaging. Phys Rev C. 2020;102:034316. [Google Scholar]
- 13.van der Meulen NP, Hasler R, Talip Z, Grundler PV, Favaretto C, Umbricht CA, et al. Developments toward the implementation of 44Sc production at a medical Cyclotron. Molecules. 2020;25:4706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Domnanich KA, Eichler R, Müller C, Jordi S, Yakusheva V, Braccini S, et al. Production and separation of 43Sc for radiopharmaceutical purposes. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2017;2:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Loveless CS, Blanco JR, Diehl GL, Elbahrawi RT, Carzaniga TS, Braccini S, et al. Cyclotron production and separation of Scandium Radionuclides from Natural Titanium Metal and Titanium Dioxide targets. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:131–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meier JP, Zhang HJ, Freifelder R, Bhuiyan M, Selman P, Mendez M, et al. Accelerator-based production of scandium radioisotopes for applications in prostate Cancer: toward building a Pipeline for Rapid Development of Novel Theranostics. Molecules. 2023;28:6041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Szkliniarz K, Sitarz M, Walczak R, Jastrzębski J, Bilewicz A, Choiński J, et al. Production of medical sc radioisotopes with an alpha particle beam. Appl Radiat Isot. 2016;118:182–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Svedjehed J, Kutyreff CJ, Engle JW, Gagnon K. Automated, cassette-based isolation and formulation of high-purity [61Cu]CuCl2 from solid ni targets. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2020;5:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chaple IF, Thiele K, Thaggard G, Fernandez S, Boros E, Lapi SE. Optimized methods for production and purification of Titanium-45. Appl Radiat Isot. 2020;166:109398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kratochwil C, Benesova M, Eder M, Neels OC, et al. The theranostic PSMA ligand PSMA-617 in the diagnosis of prostate Cancer by PET/CT: Biodistribution in humans, Radiation Dosimetry, and first evaluation of Tumor lesions. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1697–705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keyaerts M, Xavier C, Heemskerk J, Devoogdt N, Everaert H, Ackaert C, et al. Phase I study of 68Ga-HER2-Nanobody for PET/CT Assessment of HER2 expression in breast carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:27–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xu M, Zhang P, Ding J, Chen J, Huo L, Liu Z. Albumin Binder–Conjugated fibroblast activation protein inhibitor Radiopharmaceuticals for Cancer Therapy. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:952–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Badawi RD, Shi H, Hu P, Chen S, Xu T, Price PM, et al. First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:299–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gomes CV, Mendes BM, Paixão L, Gnesin S, Müller C, van der Meulen NP, et al. Comparison of the dosimetry of scandium-43 and scandium-44 patient organ doses in relation to commonly used gallium-68 for imaging neuroendocrine tumours. EJNMMI Phys. 2024;11:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Basaco Bernabeu T, Mansi R, Del Pozzo L, Zanger S, Gaonkar RH, McDougall L, et al. 61Cu-PSMA-Targeted PET for prostate cancer: from radiotracer development to First-in-Human imaging. J Nucl Med. 2024;65:1427–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Müller C, Domnanich KA, Umbricht CA, van der Meulen NP. Scandium and terbium radionuclides for radiotheranostics: current state of development towards clinical application. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20180074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vāvere AL, Laforest R, Welch MJ. Production, processing and small animal PET imaging of titanium-45. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:117–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fani M, Nicolas GP. 61Cu-labeled radiotracers: alternative or choice? J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1855–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Carter LM, Kesner AL, Pratt EC, Sanders VA, Massicano AVF, Cutler CS, et al. The impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, evaluated with phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and non-conventional radionuclides. Mol Imaging Biol. 2020;22:73–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Disselhorst JA, Brom M, Laverman P, Slump CH, Boerman OC, Oyen WJG, et al. Image-Quality Assessment for several Positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon Small-Animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:610–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vandenberghe S, Mikhaylova E, D’Hoe E, Mollet P, Karp JS. Recent developments in time-of-flight PET. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.van Sluis J, de Jong J, Schaar J, Noordzij W, van Snick P, Dierckx R, et al. Performance characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1031–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moskal P, Kisielewska D, Shopa Y, Bura R, Chhokar Z, Curceanu J. Performance assessment of the 2 γpositronium imaging with the total-body PET scanners. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gallego Manzano L, Abaline JM, Acounis S, Beaupère N, Beney JL, Bert J, et al. XEMIS2: a liquid xenon detector for small animal medical imaging. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2018;912:329–32. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pratt EC, Lopez-Montes A, Volpe A, Crowley MJ, Carter LM, Mittal V, et al. Simultaneous quantitative imaging of two PET radiotracers via the detection of positron-electron annihilation and prompt gamma emissions. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;7:1028–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moskal P, Baran J, Bass S, Choiński J, Chug N, Curceanu C, et al. Positronium image of the human brain in vivo. Sci Adv. 2024;10:eadp2840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moskal P, Dulski K, Chug N, Curceanu C, Czerwiński E, Dadgar M, et al. Positronium imaging with the novel multiphoton PET scanner. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabh4394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moskal P, Stępień EŁ. Prospects and clinical perspectives of total-body PET imaging using Plastic Scintillators. PET Clin. 2020;15:439–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Steinberger WM, Mercolli L, Breuer J, Sari H, Parzych S, Niedzwiecki S, et al. Positronium lifetime validation measurements using a long-axial field-of-view positron emission tomography scanner. EJNMMI Phys. 2024;11:76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shimazoe K, Uenomachi M. Multi-molecule imaging and inter-molecular imaging in nuclear medicine. Bio-Algorithms Med-Systems. 2022;18:127–34. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beyene E, Das M, Durak-Kozica M, Korcyl G, Mryka W, Niedźwiecki S, et al. Exploration of simultaneous dual-isotope imaging with multiphoton modular J-PET scanner. Bio-Algorithms Med-Systems. 2023;19:101–8. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Price EW, Orvig C. Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;43:260–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eppard E, de la Fuente A, Benešová M, Khawar A, Bundschuh RA, Gärtner FC, et al. Clinical translation and first In-Human use of [44Sc]Sc-PSMA-617 for PET imaging of Metastasized Castrate-resistant prostate Cancer. Theranostics. 2017;7:4359–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Umbricht CA, Benešová M, Schmid RM, Türler A, Schibli R, van der Meulen NP, et al. Sc-PSMA-617 for radiotheragnostics in tandem with 177Lu-PSMA-617—preclinical investigations in comparison with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 68Ga-PSMA-617. EJNMMI Res. 2017;44:7:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Siwowska K, Guzik P, Domnanich KA, Monné Rodríguez JM, Bernhardt P, Ponsard B, et al. Therapeutic potential of 47Sc in comparison to 177Lu and 90Y: preclinical investigations. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Loft M, Carlsen EA, Johnbeck CB, Johannesen HH, Binderup T, Pfeifer A, et al. 64Cu-DOTATATE PET in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: prospective, head-to-head comparison of imaging at 1 hour and 3 hours after injection. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:73–80. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 47.Hoberück S, Wunderlich G, Michler E, Hölscher T, Walther M, Seppelt D, et al. Dual-time-point 64Cu-PSMA-617-PET/CT in patients suffering from prostate cancer. J Label Comp Radiopharm. 2019;62:523–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bailey DL, Willowson KP, Harris M, Biggin C, Aslani A, Lengkeek NA, et al. 64Cu treatment planning and 67Cu therapy with radiolabeled [64Cu/67Cu]MeCOSar-Octreotate in subjects with unresectable multifocal meningioma: initial results for human imaging, safety, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:704–10. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 49.Roy T, Pogorilyy E, Kumarananthan CP, Kvitastein UA, Foscato M, Törnroos KW, et al. Synthesis and stability of the [45Ti]Ti-DOTA complex: en route towards aza-macrocyclic 45Ti-based radiopharmaceuticals. Chem Commun (Camb). 2024;60:7148–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.