Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 25;11(11):100601. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100601

Table 2.

The effects of auricular acupressure on sleep, mood state, and QOL among parents of children with cancer (N = 35).

Variable PSQI
POMS
PCS (QOL)
MCS (QOL)
Exp(B) 95% CI P B SE P B SE P B SE P
Intercept 4.67 1.34–16.24 0.015 27.94 5.65 < 0.001 54.18 1.37 0.000 36.31 2.46 0.000
Group
 Experimental 0.75 0.14–3.98 0.736 −11.05 6.65 0.096 1.04 1.88 0.579 2.74 3.08 0.374
Time
 Time 1 0.47 0.12–1.87 0.281 −3.07 5.54 0.580 −2.95∗ 1.31 0.025 2.13 1.54 0.166
 Time 2 1.15 0.20–6.43 0.877 −2.87 5.21 0.582 −2.31 1.94 0.233 2.39 1.79 0.183
 Time 3 0.41 0.12–1.44 0.164 −6.42 4.90 0.190 −2.68 2.14 0.211 3.21∗ 1.50 0.032
Time∗group
 AAG∗Time 1 1.59 0.29–8.86 0.594 4.29 6.82 0.529 4.52∗∗ 1.72 0.008 −2.26 2.40 0.347
 AAG∗Time 2 0.34 0.05–2.35 0.275 −0.34 6.64 0.960 2.55 2.36 0.280 0.06 2.40 0.981
 AAG∗Time 3 1.28 0.29–5.60 0.742 6.01 6.68 0.368 3.08 2.51 0.219 −0.81 2.05 0.694

P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

AAG, active auricular acupressure group; B, estimated parameter; SE, standard error; PSQI, The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; POMS, Profile of Mood State; PCS, Physical Component Summary; MCS, Mental Component Summary; QOL, quality of life.