Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 30;22:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.010

Table 3.

R-SPQ-2F learning style scores by subscales.

Gender Women
(n = 61)
Men
(n = 52)
p-value Overall
(N = 113)
Deep approach
 Mean ± SD 33.9 ± 5.71 (16.8) 35.3 ± 6.78 (19.2) 0.221 34.6 ± 6.24 (18.0)
 Median (IQR) 34.0 (30.0–38.0) 34.5 (29.8–39.3) 34.0 (30.0–39.0)
 n (Min-Max) 61 (21.0–50.0) 52 (22.0–50.0) 113 (21.0–50.0)
Surface approach
 Median (IQR) 23.0 (18.0–28.0) 21.5 (18.0–25.3) 0.585 23.0 (18.0–26.0)
 n (Min-Max) 61 (13.0–39.0) 52 (10.0–43.0) 113 (10.0–43.0)
Deep motive
 Median (IQR) 18.0 (14.0–19.0) 18.5 (15.8–20.3) 0.049 18.0 (15.0–20.0)
 n (Min-Max) 61 (10.0–25.0) 52 (12.0–25.0) 113 (10.0–25.0)
Deep strategy
 Mean ± SD 17.0 ± 3.01 (17.7) 17.2 ± 3.96 (23.1) 0.777 17.1 ± 3.46 (20.3)
 Median (IQR) 17.0 (15.0–19.0) 16.5 (14.0–20.0) 17.0 (15.0–19.0)
 n (Min-Max) 61 (10.0–25.0) 52 (8.00–25.0) 113 (8.00–25.0)
Surface motive
 Median (IQR) 9.00 (7.00–12.0) 9.00 (7.00–11.3) 0.915 9.00 (7.00–12.0)
 n (Min-Max) 61 (5.00–19.0) 52 (5.00–21.0) 113 (5.00–21.0)
Surface strategy
 Median (IQR) 13.0 (11.0–16.0) 12.0 (10.0–15.3) 0.278 13.0 (10.0–16.0)
 n (Min-Max) 61 (8.00–25.0) 52 (5.00–22.0) 113 (5.00–25.0)

2 students identifying as ‘other’ were not included in the analysis, % and p-values based on non-missing cases.