Table 1.
Comparison of the relative impact of each approach for the objective cost, residual stand damage and yarding workload. The numbers in percent show how much each objective is fulfilled in comparison to the best possible solution, focusing on only one objective. I.E. when expert layout 1 achieves a 63%, it has 37% higher costs than the 100% cost objective only solution.
| Model name | Cost Objective |
Stand Damage Objective |
Yarding Workload Objective |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOO Cost Objective | 100 | 57 | 60 |
| SOO Stand Damage Objective | 80 | 100 | 100 |
| SOO Yarding Workload Objective | 76 | 95 | 100 |
| SSO Combined Objective | 93 | 77 | 83 |
| NSGA-II 5 | 93 | 78 | 82 |
| NSGA-II 0 | 91 | 85 | 90 |
| NSGA-II 6 | 93 | 79 | 78 |
| Augmecon 00 | 100 | 57 | 60 |
| Augmecon 04 | 88 | 88 | 96 |
| Augmecon 40 | 85 | 99 | 100 |
| Expert Layout 1 | 63 | 19 | 11 |
| Expert Layout 2 | 69 | 47 | 39 |