Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 22;24:1350. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06361-7

Table 3.

Participants' self-evaluation of learning experience and confidence level following simulated training using Blue Phantom and NeedleTrainer models

Variable Blue Phantom NeedleTrainer p-Valuea
Learning experience
 Identifying critical structure 4 [4, 5] 5 [4, 5] 0.180
 Optimizing needle location 5 [4, 5] 4 [3–5]  < 0.001
 Hand–eye coordination improvement 5 [4, 5] 4 [3–5]  < 0.001
 Usefulness for future workshop 5 [5–5] 5 [4, 5] 0.001
 Practice independently 4 [3–5] 4 [3–5] 0.150
Recommended for training 5 [4, 5] 5 [4, 5] 0.015
Overall score 28 [24–30] 25 [21–29] 0.003
Confidence level
 Identifying critical structure 4 [4, 5] 4 [4, 5] 0.290
 Optimizing needle location 5 [4, 5] 4 [3–5]  < 0.001
 Hand–eye coordination improvement 4 [4, 5] 4 [3, 4]  < 0.001
 Overall score 13 [12–15] 12 [10–13]  < 0.001
 Preference 26 (55.3%) 7 (14.9%) NA

Values are expressed as median [interquartile range] and frequency (percentage)

aWilcoxon signed rank test