Table 4.
Age-adjusted prevalence of emergency transport cases.
| National† | Hirono | Naraha | Tomioka | Kawauchi | Okuma・Futaba | Katsurao・Namie | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude prevalence, % | 4.51 | 3.63 | 5.21 | 5.19 | 7.47 | 2.16 | 3.48 |
| Estimated population-based age-adjusted prevalence (95% CI), %†† | - | 3.77 (3.25–4.28) | 5.05 (4.37–5.73) | 6.41 (5.28–7.54) | 6.42 (5.32–7.53) | 2.08 (1.19–2.98) | 3.43 (2.74–4.11) |
| National population census-based age-adjusted prevalence (95% CI), % *†† | 4.58 (4.57–4.58) | 4.37 (3.78–4.96) | 6.41 (5.58–7.23) | 8.29 (6.97–9.6) | 6.77 (5.59–7.95) | 10.45 (7.11–13.8) | 6.36 (5.21–7.51) |
| Δ Age-adjusted prevalence (95% CI), %** | – | −0.60 (−1.38–0.18) | −1.36 (−2.43–−0.28) | −1.88 (−3.6–−0.15) | −0.35 (−1.96–1.27) | −8.37 (−11.84–−4.91) | −2.93 (−4.27–−1.60) |
Confidence interval (CI).
†Age-adjusted prevalence of emergency transport cases in Japan was calculated based on the 2020 national emergency transport data.
†† Age adjustment was performed using the 2015 model in Japan.
* Based on 2020 National Population Census data.
** Difference in age adjusted prevalence between the estimated population-based prevalence and census-based prevalence.