Table 2.

Internal evaluation and comparison of the three models (median (IQR)).

Models	Composition	Dice	Jaccard	HD95	precision	Recall
L3BCSM	SATA	0.954(0.930, 0.963) P = -	0.912(0.869, 0.928) P = -	3.350(2.20, 5.33) P = -	0.968(0.954,0.981) P = -	0.944(0.910,0.9625) P = -
	VATA	0.849(0.774,0.901) P = -	0.737(0.632,0.820) P = -	17.0(10, 29) P = -	0.897(0.783,0.938) P = -	0.863(0.768,0.928) P = -
	SMA	0.920(0.901, 0.936) P = -	0.852(0.820,0.880) P = -	7.800(5.6,10) P = -	0.934(0.905,0.964) P = -	0.913(0.881,0.938) P = -
UNETR	SATA	0.927(0.892,0.948) P < 0.001	0.894(0.841,0.912) P < 0.001	9.400(5.00,21.44) P < 0.001	0.941(0.899,0.971) P < 0.001	0.921(0.875,0.949) P < 0.001
	VATA	0.829(0.749,0.875) P = 0.110	0.722(0.580,0.806) P = 0.110	24.50(13.00,42.00) P = 0.0064	0.838(0.729,0.923) P = 0.038	0.845(0.769,0.910) P = 0.321
	SMA	0.856(0.801,0.888) P < 0.001	0.852(0.817,0.879) P < 0.001	39.00(23.00,49.00) P < 0.001	0.857(0.805, 0.910) P < 0.001	0.862(0.796,0.897) P < 0.001
AHNet	SATA	0.944(0.913,0.955) P = 0.002	0.864(0.805,0.902) P = 0.002	3.000(2.000,4.130) P = 0.454	0.961(0.933,0.976) P = 0.010	0.926(0.885,0.955) P = 0.048
	VATA	0.839(0.735,0.892) P = 0.075	0.708(0.598,0.778) P = 0.755	20.00(10.75,35.5) P = 0.154	0.861(0.771,0.899) P = 0.0063	0.847(0.738,0.922) P = 0.418
	SMA	0.920(0.899,0.936) P = 0.458	0.746(0.668,0.798) P = 0.456	7.050(5.00,10.25) P = 0.669	0.933(0.897,0.957) P = 0.377	0.917(0.871,0.941) P = 0.946
The Mann–Whitney U test was performed between L3BCSM and the other two models