Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 22;15:281. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01855-w

Table 2.

Diagnostic performances of different models across tenfold cross-validation

Models Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV AUC
Peritumoral 0.724 ± 0.113 0.786 ± 0.134 0.665 ± 0.158 0.723 ± 0.150 0.740 ± 0.150 0.789 ± 0.099
Intratumoral 0.650 ± 0.125 0.738 ± 0.158 0.558 ± 0.126 0.652 ± 0.138 0.658 ± 0.194 0.733 ± 0.092
Original 0.669 ± 0.097 0.664 ± 0.166 0.708 ± 0.154 0.716 ± 0.166 0.656 ± 0.143 0.742 ± 0.079
Intratumoral + peritumoral 0.703 ± 0.125 0.703 ± 0.125 0.703 ± 0.125 0.703 ± 0.125 0.703 ± 0.125 0.803 ± 0.099
Clinical 0.719 ± 0.100 0.739 ± 0.128 0.696 ± 0.170 0.744 ± 0.114 0.715 ± 0.136 0.794 ± 0.081
Ensemble 0.756 ± 0.070 0.786 ± 0.135 0.717 ± 0.132 0.773 ± 0.091 0.763 ± 0.115 0.844 ± 0.063

The results of tenfold cross-validation are expressed as mean ± standard deviation

PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval