Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 22;7(11):e2447447. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47447

Table 3. Clinic-Level Implementation Outcomes of the PROUD Trial Assessed in the 3 Years Postrandomization by Health System and Clinica.

Outcome Outcome value by health system and clinic
Health system 1 Health system 2 Health system 3 Health system 4 Health system 5 Health system 6
PROUD Usual care PROUD Usual care PROUD Usual care PROUD Usual care PROUD Usual care PROUD Usual care
Patients, No.b 30 708 52 486 20 336 41 296 21 265 21 339 30 138 20 881 29 572 27 789 39 491 42 042
Primary outcome: patient-years of OUD treatment, No.c
Prerandomization 13.3 3.9 5.3 11.2 8.3 20.3 1.1 13.6 0.4 0 12.4 14.3
Postrandomization 68.1 13.1 22.1 17.7 33.7 56.3 6.5 23.5 9.8 0 43.4 26
Difference (post vs pre)d 54.8 9.2 16.7 6.5 25.5 36.0 5.5 9.8 9.5 0 31.0 11.7
PROUD vs usual care difference (95% CI)e,f 45.6 (31.8 to 58.5) 10.2 (−1.4 to 20.3) −10.5 (−28.4 to 9.0) −4.4 (−12.4 to 4.4) 9.5 (1.2 to 14.0) 19.3 (8.5 to 30.7)
Secondary outcomes of patient-years of OUD treatment
Ongoing treatmentg
Prerandomization 9.2 1.1 4.7 9.3 4.9 8.3 0.3 10.1 0 0 8.3 8.2
Postrandomization 18.0 7.5 4.1 11.9 11.3 17.1 0 17.4 0 0 9.7 10.4
Difference (post vs pre)d 8.9 6.3 −0.6 2.6 6.4 8.9 −0.3 7.3 0 0 1.5 2.2
PROUD vs usual care difference (95% CI)e,h 2.5 (−5.5 to 10.6) −3.2 (−8.9 to 2.5) −2.4 (−13.6 to 8.8) −7.6 (−15.8 to 0.7) NA −0.7 (−8.5 to 7.1)
Newly initiatede,i
Prerandomization 4.2 2.8 0.6 2.0 3.4 12.0 0.7 3.5 0.4 0 4.1 6.0
Postrandomization 50.1 5.7 18.0 5.8 22.4 39.2 6.5 6.1 9.8 0 33.7 15.6
Difference (post vs pre)d 45.9 2.9 17.3 3.9 19.0 27.1 5.8 2.6 9.4 0 29.6 9.6
PROUD vs usual care difference (95% CI)e,f 43.0 (28 to 55.8) 13.4 (1.5 to 21.8) −8.1 (−25 to 8.8) 3.2 (−2.4 to 9.3) 9.4 (1.1 to 14.0) 20.0 (9.8 to 29.6)
Restricted to when nurse was seeing patients
Prerandomization 13.3 3.9 5.3 11.2 8.3 20.3 1.1 13.6 0.4 0 12.4 14.3
Postrandomization 73.9 13.5 16.9 12.6 32.0 53.1 6.2 16.5 8.0 0.0 44.6 25.3
Difference (post vs pre)d 60.6 9.6 11.6 1.3 23.7 32.8 5.2 2.9 7.6 0.0 32.2 11.1
PROUD vs usual care difference (95% CI)e,f 51.0 (35.9 to 65.2) 10.2 (0.7 to 18.8) −9.1 (−26.6 to 11.3) 2.3 (−5.3 to 9.1) 7.6 (1.0 to 11.3) 21.1 (9.5 to 32.8)
Newly initiated and restricted to when nurse was seeing patientsi
Prerandomization 4.2 2.8 0.6 2.0 3.4 12.0 0.7 3.5 0.4 0 4.1 6.0
Postrandomization 56.3 6.3 14.4 4.1 23.2 40.5 6.2 5.7 8.0 0 35.7 16.1
Difference (post vs pre)d 52.2 3.5 13.8 2.2 19.8 28.5 5.5 2.2 7.6 0.0 31.6 10.0
PROUD vs usual care difference (95% CI)e,f 48.7 (31.9 to 62.9) 11.6 (1.4 to 18.7) −8.7 (−25.4 to 8.3) 3.3 (−2.8 to 9.8) 7.6 (1.0 to 11.3) 21.6 (10.9 to 31.8)

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; OUD, opioid use disorder; PROUD, Primary Care OUD Treatment trial.

a

Results presented per 10 000 primary care patients, which was calculated by dividing by the number of patients seen in the clinic postrandomization and multiplied by 10 000.

b

Number of eligible primary care patients assigned to the clinics in 3 years prior to randomization and up to 2 years postrandomization.

c

Treatment was defined as having a medication order or procedure code for buprenorphine formulations that are indicated for OUD or having a medication order or procedure code for extended-release injectable naltrexone.

d

Calculated by subtracting prerandomization from postrandomization patient-years of OUD treatment for each clinic.

e

Calculated by subtracting the usual care difference (in prerandomization and postrandomization patient-years of OUD treatment) from the intervention clinic difference for each health system.

f

95% CI is based on bootstrap t method, described in the statistical analysis plan in Supplement 1.

g

Ongoing treatment was defined as OUD treatment for patients with less than a 365-day gap in OUD treatment.

h

95% CI is based on a normal approximation rather than bootstrap t method due to rare outcome events.

i

Newly initiated was defined as OUD treatment for those with no OUD treatment in the past 365 days.