Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 22;7(11):e2429630. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29630

Table. Mean Bias of Accuracy Estimates for 1000 Resampled Studies of 100, 200, 500, and 1000 Participants .

Mean difference (95% CI), percentage points
Sample size = 100 Sample size = 200 Sample size = 500 Sample size = 1000
Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity
Sample-specific optimal cutoff scorea – Population-level optimal cutoff score ≥8b 6.4 (5.7 to 7.1) 0.6 (0.0 to 1.2) 4.9 (4.3 to 5.5) −0.3 (−0.8 to 0.2) 2.2 (1.8 to 2.6) 0.0 (−0.4 to 0.3) 1.8 (1.5 to 2.1) −0.6 (−1.0 to −0.3)
Sample-specific cutoff score ≥8 – Population-level optimal cutoff score ≥8 −0.8 (−1.7 to 0.0) 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.4) 0.2 (−0.3 to 0.8) −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.1) 0.1 (−0.2 to 0.4) 0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1) −0.1 (−0.4 to 0.1) 0.0 (−0.1 to 0.1)
a

Sample-specific optimal cutoff score refers to the cutoff score maximizing the Youden index in each simulated sample.

b

The optimal cutoff score in the full Patient Health Questionnaire-9 individual participant data meta-analysis dataset is 8 or higher (sensitivity = 80.4%, specificity = 82.0%).