Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 17;23(6):2308–2323. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01727-5

Table 3.

Comparison between cerebellar irAE and PCA

Features Cerebellar irAE PCA p Value
Sex, n (%) N = 35 N = 15
 Female 10 (29) 10 (67) 0.01
 Male 25 (71) 5 (33)
Abs, n (%) N = 31 N = 15
 Ab positivity 15 (48) 9 (60) > 0.05
  High risk Abs 7 8 < 0.05
   [Anti-Yo] [3] [6] [< 0.05]
   [Anti-Hu] [2] [1] [> 0.05]
  UNCA 2 0 > 0.05
  Other Abs 6 1 > 0.05
 Ab negativity 16 (52) 6 (40)
Tumor type, n (%) N = 35 N = 15
 NSCLC 12 (34) 1 (7) > 0.05
 SCLC 9 (26) 1 (7) > 0.05
 Lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC) 21 (60) 2 (13) < 0.01
 Gynecological and breast cancer 1 (3) 5 (42) < 0.01
Symptoms, n (%) N = 32 N = 15
 “isolated cerebellar ataxia” 13 (37) 1 (7) < 0.05
 ataxia and dysarthria 6 (17) 6 (40) > 0.05
 ataxia and ocular involvement 4 (11) 5 (33) > 0.05
 ataxia and (ocular involvement or dysarthria) 10 (28) 11 (73) < 0.01
 “pancerebellar syndrome” 9 (26) 3 (20) > 0.05
Immune-modulating therapy, n (%) N = 35 N = 15
 Yes 33 (94) 10 (67) < 0.05
 None 2 (6) 5 (33)
Neurological outcome, n (%) N = 35 N = 13
 Improvement 25 (71) 5 (33) < 0.05
 No improvement/worsening 10 (29) 8 (53)

Abbreviations Ab, antibody; irAE, immune-related adverse event; n, number; N, total number of patients considered as per data availability; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PCA, paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxia; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; UNCA, antibodies binding to unclassified antigens