Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 23;14:29052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78971-6

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a) Normalized transmission spectra inside an \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$N=3$$\end{document} MDPC device with the +26% (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r=1.26$$\end{document}) defect in the center cavity, as determined through computational simulations and experimental measurements. (b) Electric field profiles of computationally resolved defect and static states. The energy state approximately at 566nm corresponds to the transmission peak of the defect state and the state at 679nm corresponds to the transmission peak of the static state.