Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 31;58(19):74–82. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.7081

Table 3.

Histopathologic Parameters of Patients who Underwent Rectal Cancer Surgery

Histopathologic Parameters R (n=15) L (n=15) O (n=15) p-value
Histology
 Adenocarcinoma 15 (100%) 15 (100%) 15 (100%) -
 Well-differentiated 8 (53.33%) 7 (46.67%) 7 (46.67%) -
 Moderately differentiated 5 (33.33%) 8 (53.33%) 7 (46.67%) -
 Poorly differentiated 2 (13.33%) 0 (0%) 1 (6.67%) -

Resection margin 0.1230
 R0 13 (86.67%) 15 (100%) 15 (100%)
 R1 2 (13.33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 R2 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Circumferential resection margin 0.0310
 Positive (Less than 1 mm) 4 (30.77%) 1 (6.67%) 0 (0%)
 Negative 9 (69.23%) 14 (93.33%) 15 (100%)
 Undetermined/Not reported 2 (13.33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Proximal resection margin (cm) Mean 11.10 Mean 6.73 Mean 5.37 0.0002
Range 2-16.5 Range 3.5-11 Range 2.5-11
SD ±4.77 SD ±2.84 SD ±2.70

Bonferroni multiple comparison
R > O (p-value <0.001)
R > L (p-value 0.005)
L vs O (p-value 0.06)

Distal resection margin (cm) Mean 2.45 Mean 2.55 Mean 3.87 0.0819
Range 0.1-5 Range 0-8 Range 1-7.5
SD ±1.78 SD ±1.93 SD ±1.78

Lymph node harvest Mean 11.40 Mean 15.20 Mean 16.93 0.01
Range 3-20 Range 3-27 Range 2-34
SD ±4.40 SD ±7.27 SD ±10.65

Bonferroni multiple comparison
O vs L (p-value 0.07)
L > R (p-value <0.001)
O > R (p-value <0.001)

Positive lymph node harvest Mean 9.21% Mean 9.15% Mean 7.93% 0.8844
Range 0%-50% Range 0%-77% Range 0%-33%
SD ±15.85% SD ±20.27% SD ±12.17%

Perineural invasion 0.5660
 Yes 2 (15.38%) 1 (6.67%) 3 (20.00%)
 No 11 (73.33%) 14 (93.33%) 12 (80.00%)
 Undetermined 2 (13.33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Lymphovascular invasion 0.0010
 Yes 3 (23.08%) 12 (80.00%) 10 (66.67%)
 No 10 (76.92%) 3 (20.00%) 5 (33.33%)
 Undetermined 2 (13.33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Bonferroni multiple comparison
L > R (p-value <0.0010)
O > R (p-value <0.0020)
L vs O (p-value – 0.09)

R – robot-assisted rectal surgery; L – laparoscopic surgery; O – open surgery