Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 17;28(12):4167–4178. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04488-8

Table 1.

Socio-demographic profile of the 93 respondents

Heterosexual men (N = 11) Heterosexual women
(N = 13)
MSM
(N = 69)
Total
(N = 93)
Gender
Male 11 (100%) - 68 (99%) 79 (85%)
Female - 11 (85%) - 11 (12%)
Transgender female - 2 (15%) - 2 (2%)
Transgender male - - 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
Age (in years)
19–29 1 (9%) 2 (15%) 16 (24%) 19 (21%)
30–39 6 (55%) 4 (31%) 25 (37%) 35 (38%)
40–49 3 (27%) 4 (31%) 9 (13%) 16 (17%)
50–59 1 (9%) 3 (23%) 14 (21%) 18 (20%)
60+ - - 4 (6%) 4 (4%)
Nationality
Belgian 11 (100%) 8 (62%) 52 (75%) 71 (76%)
Other European - 2 (15%) 8 (12%) 10 (11%)
Sub-Saharan African - - 3 (4%) 3 (3%)
Other - 3 (23%) 6 (9%) 9 (10%)
Education level
Primary education - 1 (8%) 5 (7%) 6 (6%)
Secondary education 6 (55%) 8 (62%) 23 (33%) 37 (40%)
Higher education 5 (45%) 4 (31%) 41 (60%) 50 (54%)
Occupation
Employed full-time 11 (100%) 6 (46%) 42 (61%) 59 (63%)
Employed part-time - 3 (23%) 7 (10%) 10 (11%)
Student - 1 (8%) 6 (9%) 7 (8%)
Unemployed - 3 (23%) 8 (12%) 11 (12%)
Not able to work - - 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
Not allowed to work - - 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
Retired - - 3 (4%) 3 (3%)
Other 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
Self-reported sexual orientation
Homosexual/lesbian - 2 (15%)a 51 (74%) 53 (57%)
Heterosexual/straight 11 (100%) 11 (85%) 1 (1%) 23 (25%)
Bisexual - - 16 (23%) 16 (17%)
Other - - 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
Type of partners
Only casual partner(s) 2 (18%) 2 (15%) 28 (41%) 32 (34%)
Only steady partner 4 (36%) 5 (39%) 11 (16%) 20 (22%)
Both steady and casual partner(s) 5 (46%) 5 (39%) 24 (39%) 34 (37%)
No partners - 1 (7%) 6 (8%) 7 (8%)

aRespondents were categorized by the combination of the reported ‘gender’ and ‘most probable way of infection’, without considering the self-reported sexual orientation. Transgender women were therefore categorized as ‘heterosexual women’ as they reported being infected through male sex although they identified themselves as ‘homosexual’