Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 24;148(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00401-024-02828-5

Table 1.

Participant demographics, ROS/MAP

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex bulk RNASeq Caudate Nucleus bulk RNASeq Posterior cingulate cortex bulk RNASeq Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex TMT proteomics
Sample size 917 692 513 386
AD pathological diagnosis, no. (%) 554 (60) 423 (61) 299 (58) 221 (57)
AD clinical diagnosis, no. (%) 393 (43) 276 (40) 192 (37) 122 (32)
MCI clinical diagnosis, no. (%) 229 (25) 188 (27) 134 (26) 98 (25)
No cognitive impairment, no. (%) 295 (32) 228 (33) 187 (36) 166 (43)
APOE-ε4 carrier, no. (%) 234 (26) 187 (27) 130 (26) 79 (20)
Non-hispanic white, no. (%) 903 (98) 686 (99) 504 (98) 370 (96)
Female, no. (%) 597 (65) 450 (65) 318 (62) 271 (70)
Age at death (years) 89.42 ± 6.69 89.33 ± 6.46 89.34 ± 6.55 89.31 ± 6.51
Education (years) 16.38 ± 3.54 16.3 ± 3.54 16.38 ± 3.51 15.79 ± 3.55
Average follow-up time (years) 7.54 ± 4.97 7.66 ± 4.83 7.47 ± 4.86 8.75 ± 4.46
Global cognition score (last visit) −0.8 ± 1.06 −0.78 ± 1.07 −0.7 ± 1.05 −0.51 ± 1.03
Post-mortem interval (hours) 7.56 ± 4.32 7.62 ± 4.39 7.02 ± 4.04 8.06 ± 5.46
CERAD, “moderate” or “frequent”, no. (%) 599 (65) 455 (66) 320 (62) 241 (62)
Braak III–VI, no. (%) 760 (83) 579 (84) 417 (81) 313 (81)

Values are mean ± standard deviation or number of samples (percent of the group)

Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD) protocol for neuritic amyloid plaque density scores: (“none”, “sparse”, “moderate”, or “frequent”). Braak staging for neurofibrillary tangle distribution and severity (from 0; least severe, to VI; most severe)

AD Alzheimer’s disease, MCI mild cognitive impairment, APOE-ε4 apolipoprotein E epsilon 4