Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 16;16(11):595–606. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i11.595

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent macroscopic on-site evaluation after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration or biopsy

Characteristics

Age (years), mean ± SD 59 ± 12
Sex, n (%)
    Female 499 (49.5)
    Male 509 (50.5)
Lesion location, n (%)
    Pancreas 664 (62)
    Stomach 101 (9.4)
    Lymph nodes 96 (8.9)
    Liver 46 (4.2)
    Mediastinum 38 (3.5)
    Other 129 (12)
    Total 1074 (100)
The mean size of the target lesion on EUS (mm), mean ± SD 38 ± 17
Approach, n (%)
    Transduodenal 585 (58)
    Transgastric 350 (34.7)
    Transesophageal 62 (6.2)
    Transrectal 11 (1.1)
Type of the needle (FNA or FNB), n (%)
    FNA 101 (10)
    FNA-Expect-Boston 68 (6.7)
    FNA-EchoTip-Cook 33 (3.3)
    FNB 907 (90)
    FNB-Acquire-Boston 751 (74.5)
    FNB-Medtronic 20 (2)
    FNB-ProCore-Cook 40 (4)
    FNB-Trident-Microtech 96 (9.5)
Specimen acquisition method, n (%)
    Suction method 381 (37.8)
    Capillary method 290 (28.8)
    Both 337 (33.4)
Number of needle passes (FNB), n (%)
    1 154 (15.3)
    2 680 (67.5)
    3 149 (14.8)
    4 25 (2.5)
Final diagnosis (conclusive or inconclusive), n (%)
    Conclusive 963 (95.5)
    Benign 102 (10.1)
    Malignant 861 (85.4)
    Inconclusive 45 (4.5)
Postprocedural adverse events, n (%)
    No 975 (96.7)
    Yes 33 (3.3)
    Abdominal pain 17 (1.7)
    Small blood collection 10 (1)
    Transient fever 6 (0.6)

EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound; FNA: Fine-needle aspiration; FNB: Fine-needle biopsy.