Table 2.
Draft Data Extraction Tool |
---|
Study Characteristics: |
1. Author(s); |
2. Year of publication; |
3. Country of origin; |
4. Study design; |
5. Study setting; |
6. Funding source. |
Population: |
7. Sample size; |
8. Age range; |
9. Gender distribution; |
10. Year of study; |
11. Inclusion/exclusion criteria. |
Concept: |
12. Educational interventions or exposures related to patient safety; |
13. Duration and frequency of interventions; |
14. Delivery methods (e.g., lectures, simulations, online modules); |
15. Content areas covered. |
Context: |
16. Undergraduate nursing program characteristics; |
17. Curricular integration of patient safety content; |
18. Institutional support for patient safety education. |
Methods: |
19. Data collection methods; |
20. Outcome measures; |
21. Validity and reliability of measurement tools; |
22. Data analysis techniques. |
Key Findings: |
23. Changes in patient safety knowledge scores; |
24. Factors associated with knowledge acquisition; |
25. Retention of knowledge over time; |
26. Impact on skills, attitudes, or behaviors related to patient safety; |
27. Barriers and facilitators to effective patient safety education. |
Other: |
28. Limitations; |
29. Recommendations for future research; |
30. Implications for nursing education and practice. |
The table “Draft Data Extraction Tool” provides a detailed structure for extracting data from studies on educational interventions related to patient safety in nursing programs. It is organized into several sections, each addressing different aspects of the studies. Source: Author.