Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2024 Oct 1;28(12):4005–4019. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04499-5

Table 4.

Proportion of Black Respondents Classified as Having Low Vs High Latent PrEP Stigma With and Without Correcting for Measurement Bias (PrEP@Home Enrollees from Sites in 3 Regions of the United States were Cisgender Men who have Sex with Men Ages 18–49)

Standard IRTa
Sum score
Low High Low High

DIF-corrected Low 0.67 0.08 0.56 0.16
IRT analyses High 0.08 0.17 0.11 0.12
Proportion differentially classified 0.16 [CI: 0.11, 0.23] 0.27 [CI: 0.21, 0.33]
a

Item response theory analyses (without correction for differential item functioning [DIF])