Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 12;14:1446945. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1446945

Table 3.

Results comparison.

Outcome CORRECT^ CORRELATE Actual series^^
Median age, years (range) 61 (64–67) 65 (24–93) 65 (35–85)
Male, % 62% 61% 58%
ECOG
 0 52% 41% 21%
 1 48% 46% 66%
 ≥2 NA* 6% 12%
KRAS
 Wild type 41% 37% 38%
 Mutated 54% 56% 62%
 Unknown 5% 7% 0%
Liver metastasis NS 72% 87%
Peritoneum metastasis NS 13% 31%
Prior regimens
 1–2 27% 30% 22%
 3 25% 30% 51%
 ≥4 49% 39% 27%
Response evaluation
 Partial response 1% 4% 0%
 Stable disease 40% 22% 1%
 Progression 59%** 47% 81%
 Not evaluated 27% 18%
mTD 1.7 months 2.5 months 2.52 months
mPFS 1.9 months 2.9 months 2.40 months
mOS 6.4 months 7.7 months 4.76 months
Safety
 Dose reduction 38% 40% 29%
 Inferior starting dose NA 43% 56%
Toxicity
 Grade 1–2 39% 45% 68%
 Grade 3–4 54% 35% 15%
 Fatigue 47% 41% 59%
 Hand–foot skin reaction 47% 26% 29%
 Diarrhea 34% 19% 8%

NA, not applicable; NS, not specified; mTD, median treatment duration; mPFS, median progression-free survival; mOS, median overall survival.

^These data are from the cohort treated with regorafenib, not the entire population.

^^Data may not be the same as those reflected in this study because percentages have been rounded in this table.

*ECOG 2 was an exclusion criterion.

**Separate data not provided.