Table 7.
Positive and negative assessment of the program.
| Items | All | Athletes | Women | Young | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Satisfaction | 4.51 ± 0.51 | 4.70 ± 0.48 | 4.44 ± 0.53 | 4.44 ± 0.51 |
| 4 | Motivation to be engaged in more physical activities | 4.23 ± 0.81 | 4.50 ± 0.71 | 4.11 ± 0.93 | 4.13 ± 0.81 |
| 5 | To exercise from home | 3.94 ± 1.03 | 4.30 ± 0.82 | 3.89 ± 1.17 | 3.75 ± 1.06 |
| 6 | A free of charge course | 4.06 ± 0.97 | 4.60 ± 0.70 | 4.11 ± 0.93 | 3.69 ± 1.01 |
| 7 | Instructors’ professionalism | 4.29 ± 0.89 | 4.60 ± 0.70 | 4.00 ± 0.87 | 4.25 ± 1.00 |
| 8 | The type of exercises | 4.00 ± 0.91 | 4.20 ± 0.79 | 3.78 ± 0.97 | 4.00 ± 0.97 |
| 9 | Choice between synchronous and asynchronous mode | 4.03 ± 0.95 | 4.40 ± 0.84 | 4.00 ± 0.87 | 3.81 ± 1.05 |
| 10 | Social messages for a healthy lifestyle on the platform | 3.34 ± 0.97 | 3.50 ± 0.85 | 3.67 ± 0.87 | 3.06 ± 1.06 |
| 11 | Choice among multiple time slots | 4.03 ± 1.10 | 4.10 ± 1.37 | 4.11 ± 0.93 | 3.94 ± 1.06 |
| 12 | How limiting was the lack of direct support for you? | 2.09 ± 1.04 | 2.40 ± 1.35 | 1.89 ± 1.05 | 2.00 ± 0.82 |
| 13 | Lack of contact with other participants | 2.26 ± 1.09 | 2.80 ± 1.32 | 1.78 ± 0.97 | 2.19 ± 0.91 |
| 14 | Training time slots | 1.60 ± 0.91 | 2.20 ± 1.03a | 1.44 ± 1.01 | 1.31 ± 0.60 |
| 15 | Negative impact of physical activities | 1.51 ± 0.92 | 1.80 ± 1.23 | 1.56 ± 1.01 | 1.31 ± 0.60 |
| 16 | Post session overall opinion | 2.03 ± 1.04 | 2.10 ± 1.10 | 2.00 ± 1.00 | 2.00 ± 1.10 |
a
Pairwise comparisons indicated significant differences between ATHLETES vs. WOMEN and YOUNG scores (respectively with p = 0.026 and p = 0.009).