Table 2.
and F1 metrics obtained with instance segmentation models and H &E normalization methods
Model e | Model f | Model g | Model h | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | Reference | F1 | F1 | F1 | F1 | ||||
No normalization | - | 91.23 | 0.81 | 89.49 | 0.80 | 89.64 | 0.80 | 87.59 | 0.79 |
Macenko et al. [42] | Ref-1 | 89.68 | 0.80 | 87.80 | 0.79 | 89.48 | 0.80 | 89.33 | 0.80 |
Ref-2 | 89.54 | 0.80 | 87.64 | 0.79 | 87.40 | 0.79 | 89.47 | 0.80 | |
Ref-3 | 89.73 | 0.80 | 87.59 | 0.79 | 87.63 | 0.79 | 87.56 | 0.79 | |
Reinhard et al. [43] | Ref-1 | 76.34 | 0.59 | 85.42 | 0.78 | 86.28 | 0.77 | 85.28 | 0.78 |
Ref-2 | 85.60 | 0.78 | 86.63 | 0.77 | 86.32 | 0.77 | 87.45 | 0.79 | |
Ref-3 | 87.33 | 0.79 | 85.79 | 0.78 | 85.76 | 0.78 | 87.38 | 0.79 | |
Tosta et al. [28] | Ref-1 | 87.62 | 0.79 | 87.41 | 0.79 | 89.13 | 0.80 | 89.57 | 0.80 |
Ref-2 | 90.86 | 0.81 | 89.27 | 0.80 | 87.22 | 0.79 | 89.42 | 0.80 | |
Ref-3 | 90.67 | 0.81 | 89.44 | 0.80 | 87.43 | 0.79 | 87.66 | 0.79 | |
Vahadane et al. [27] | Ref-1 | 87.52 | 0.79 | 87.63 | 0.79 | 89.22 | 0.80 | 90.07 | 0.81 |
Ref-2 | 90.78 | 0.81 | 85.43 | 0.78 | 85.64 | 0.78 | 89.71 | 0.80 | |
Ref-3 | 90.69 | 0.81 | 85.36 | 0.78 | 85.47 | 0.78 | 87.64 | 0.80 |