Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 26;37(4):1691–1710. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01041-w

Table 4.

Evaluation of handcrafted features combined with traditional classifiers and stain normalization on non-segmented images

LOG RF SVM
Method Reference ACC(%) F1 ACC(%) F1 ACC(%) F1
No normalization - 78.83 0.78 85.74 0.83 88.38 0.86
Macenko et al. [42] Ref-1 75.44 0.74 83.28 0.82 86.84 0.86
Ref-2 76.32 0.75 82.94 0.82 86.31 0.85
Ref-3 77.23 0.76 83.77 0.83 87.08 0.84
Reinhard et al. [43] Ref-1 77.44 0.76 84.12 0.83 87.29 0.83
Ref-2 76.38 0.76 85.69 0.84 84.72 0.82
Ref-3 77.03 0.78 85.50 0.83 83.31 0.82
Tosta et al. [28] Ref-1 78.13 0.78 84.83 0.84 86.22 0.85
Ref-2 77.84 0.78 85.17 0.85 86.37 0.85
Ref-3 78.21 0.78 84.93 0.83 86.94 0.85
Vahadane et al. [27] Ref-1 77.86 0.77 84.72 0.82 88.42 0.87
Ref-2 79.38 0.79 85.43 0.83 87.63 0.86
Ref-3 78.94 0.79 85.68 0.82 87.51 0.86