Table 4.
Evaluation of handcrafted features combined with traditional classifiers and stain normalization on non-segmented images
LOG | RF | SVM | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | Reference | F1 | F1 | F1 | |||
No normalization | - | 78.83 | 0.78 | 85.74 | 0.83 | 88.38 | 0.86 |
Macenko et al. [42] | Ref-1 | 75.44 | 0.74 | 83.28 | 0.82 | 86.84 | 0.86 |
Ref-2 | 76.32 | 0.75 | 82.94 | 0.82 | 86.31 | 0.85 | |
Ref-3 | 77.23 | 0.76 | 83.77 | 0.83 | 87.08 | 0.84 | |
Reinhard et al. [43] | Ref-1 | 77.44 | 0.76 | 84.12 | 0.83 | 87.29 | 0.83 |
Ref-2 | 76.38 | 0.76 | 85.69 | 0.84 | 84.72 | 0.82 | |
Ref-3 | 77.03 | 0.78 | 85.50 | 0.83 | 83.31 | 0.82 | |
Tosta et al. [28] | Ref-1 | 78.13 | 0.78 | 84.83 | 0.84 | 86.22 | 0.85 |
Ref-2 | 77.84 | 0.78 | 85.17 | 0.85 | 86.37 | 0.85 | |
Ref-3 | 78.21 | 0.78 | 84.93 | 0.83 | 86.94 | 0.85 | |
Vahadane et al. [27] | Ref-1 | 77.86 | 0.77 | 84.72 | 0.82 | 88.42 | 0.87 |
Ref-2 | 79.38 | 0.79 | 85.43 | 0.83 | 87.63 | 0.86 | |
Ref-3 | 78.94 | 0.79 | 85.68 | 0.82 | 87.51 | 0.86 |