Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
letter
. 2024 Sep 17;38(6):e14382. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14382

Misrepresentation of invasive species in the mass media with images of unrelated organisms

Mark K L Wong 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11589081  PMID: 39286930

Public interest in invasive species and their impacts on ecosystems has grown in recent years, fueled not only by coordinated scientific efforts (Roy et al., 2023) but also by international media coverage (Cai, 2023; Chung, 2023; Greenfield, 2023; Regan, 2023). Communication theory underscores that the mass media plays a key role in setting agenda and shaping public opinion across diverse societies and cultures (McCombs & Valenzuela, 2021). Accordingly, accurate portrayals of invasive species and biological invasions in print and digital news, magazines, and social media are indispensable for promoting public understanding of these environmental problems as complex socioecological phenomena (Courchamp et al., 2017; Kueffer & Larson, 2014; Larson, 2005). Effective reporting can even boost public support and engagement with management efforts, such as citizen science initiatives for detecting invasive species (Haley et al., 2023; Koen & Newton, 2021). Yet, despite their potential to shape public awareness and opinion, portrayals of invasive species in the mass media remain understudied (but see Ballari & Barrios‐García, 2022; Car et al., 2023; Woodworth et al., 2023).

Although some attention has been paid to the tone and language used in media reports on invasive species (Car et al., 2023), another fundamental challenge is ensuring that the images featured accurately portray the species discussed, instead of other unrelated organisms. This is a pertinent issue for reports on invasive species of lesser known and diverse groups, such as numerous invertebrates (Turner et al., 2021; Wong et al., 2023). Problems are especially likely to occur when journalists are only provided with common names and lack access to accurate images of the organisms. This tends to promote the undesirable sourcing of images from stock image repositories, which can contain vast inaccuracies.

Consider recent media coverage on the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta), one of the world's most damaging and widespread invasive species (Lowe et al., 2000). International news reports from the past year discussing S. invicta infestations in Australia (Gillespie, 2023; Vidler, 2024), Asia (Khoo, 2024), and Europe (Heath, 2024; Knapton, 2023; Symons, 2023) featured images depicting a variety of other ant species (Figure 1), all of which were incorrectly identified as “fire ant” in the captions. The credits of many images suggested they were sourced from stock image repositories such as iStock (istockphoto.com) and Getty Images (gettyimages.com). When I performed an image search for “red imported fire ant” on these 2 platforms, only 3 out of the top 40 images depicted ants of the fire ant genus Solenopsis. All others displayed species from morphologically and taxonomically distinct genera (e.g., Atta, Formica, Iridomyrmex, Myrmica, Oecophylla, Pogonomyrmex, Tapinoma) (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Recent media reports on invasions by red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) in Asia, Australia, and Europe have featured stock images that incorrectly show other ant species. All images obtained from AntWeb (2024) (photographer: April Nobile).

The repercussions of inaccurate depictions of the wrong organisms as invasive species in the mass media are nontrivial. They risk perpetuating negative stereotypes about native species, misdirecting management efforts, or causing unwarranted public alarm. For instance, one article (Khoo, 2024) from a leading media outlet in Southeast Asia warned of the severe medical effects of venomous stings by S. invicta, but featured an image of Oecophylla smaragdina—a native ant species commonly found in forests and urban parks and gardens, which not only lacks a sting, but moreover plays key roles in multiple ecosystem functions regionally (Crozier et al., 2010).

At a fundamental level, scientific inaccuracies in media reports undermine scientific credibility. The persistence of taxonomic inaccuracies and confusion in media reports on invasive species risks eroding public trust in conservation and management actions, which can already be provocative and contentious (Crowley et al., 2017; Larson, 2005).

As scientists, we should take proactive measures to mitigate the spread of taxonomic inconsistencies in the media. Unfortunately, once an article is published in the rapid news cycle, identifying and rectifying errors becomes arduous. Therefore, it is crucial to establish effective communication with journalists from the outset.

As far as possible, we should provide journalists with accurate images that emphasize distinctive features that can aid in identifying invasive species and distinguishing these from other species. For example, a British news report on the invasive Vespa velutina by Sherratt (2024) features a diagram that contrasts the size and abdominal markings of this species with other common Hymenoptera found locally. If accurate images are not in our possession, we can point journalists to reliable taxon‐specific image repositories (e.g., AntWeb, 2024) or photographers and illustrators with taxonomic expertise. At bare minimum, we should provide journalists with species’ scientific names, underscore the importance of using these consistently, and explain the pitfalls of exclusively using common names (Stevens et al., 2014).

Addressing inconsistencies and misrepresentations in the media ultimately requires concerted efforts from both scientists and journalists. By working together to promote accuracy and transparency in media portrayals, we can safeguard the integrity of ecological science and bolster effective conservation practices. This collaboration not only enhances public understanding, but also strengthens support for vital conservation efforts worldwide.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

M.K.L.W. is supported by a Forrest Fellowship from the Forrest Research Foundation.

Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Western Australia, as part of the Wiley ‐ The University of Western Australia agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Article impact statement: News on invasive species featuring images of the wrong organisms may erode trust in conservation efforts and cause unnecessary public alarm.

REFERENCES

  1. AntWeb . (2024). AntWeb. Version 8.109 . California Academy of Science. https://www.antweb.org [Google Scholar]
  2. Ballari, S. A. , & Barrios‐García, M. N. (2022). Mismatch between media coverage and research on invasive species: The case of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Argentina. PLoS ONE, 17, Article e0279601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cai, V. (2023). China targets invasive plants and animals in 3‐year crackdown. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/3228649/china‐targets‐invasive‐plants‐and‐animals‐3‐year‐crackdown [Google Scholar]
  4. Car, V. , Ader, N. E. , Anderson, C. B. , & Valenzuela, A. E. J. (2023). Media representations of introduced invasive mammals: A comparison between trends in Argentina and Tierra del Fuego province. In Valenzuela A. E. J., Anderson C. B., Ballari S. A., & Ojeda R. A. (Eds.) Introduced invasive mammals of Argentina (pp. 193–205). SAREM. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chung, L. (2023). Why Australia is on the front line of a global war on invasive species. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/why‐australia‐is‐on‐the‐front‐line‐of‐a‐global‐war‐on‐invasive‐species‐20230904‐p5e1pk.html [Google Scholar]
  6. Courchamp, F. , Fournier, A. , Bellard, C. , Bertelsmeier, C. , Bonnaud, E. , Jeschke, J. M. , & Russell, J. C. (2017). Invasion biology: Specific problems and possible solutions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32, 13–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crowley, S. L. , Hinchliffe, S. , & McDonald, R. A. (2017). Conflict in invasive species management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15, 133–141. [Google Scholar]
  8. Crozier, R. H. , Newey, P. S. , Schluens, E. A. , & Robson, S. K. (2010). A masterpiece of evolution—Oecophylla weaver ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 13, 57–71. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillespie, E. (2023). Queensland to extend fire ant control zone into NSW in bid to stop their march to the border. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia‐news/2023/jul/25/queensland‐to‐extend‐fire‐ant‐control‐zone‐into‐nsw‐in‐bid‐to‐stop‐their‐march‐to‐the‐border [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenfield, P. (2023). Invasive species cost humans $423bn each year and threaten world's diversity. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/04/invasive‐species‐cost‐humans‐423bn‐each‐year‐and‐threaten‐worlds‐diversity‐aoe [Google Scholar]
  11. Haley, A. L. , Lemieux, T. A. , Piczak, M. L. , Karau, S. , D'Addario, A. , Irvine, R. L. , Beaudoin, C. , Bennett, J. R. , & Cooke, S. J. (2023). On the effectiveness of public awareness campaigns for the management of invasive species. Environmental Conservation, 50, 202–211. [Google Scholar]
  12. Heath, L. (2024). Fears that fire ants with painful sting will arrive in UK due to climate change. iNews. https://inews.co.uk/news/fire‐ants‐arrive‐uk‐climate‐change‐3061622 [Google Scholar]
  13. Khoo, B. K. (2024). Fire ants, hornets, bed bugs: What to do if you get bitten or stung, and when to see a doctor. Channel News Asia. https://cnalifestyle.channelnewsasia.com/wellness/insect‐bites‐treatment‐hornet‐fire‐ants‐bed‐bugs‐386711) [Google Scholar]
  14. Knapton, S. (2023). London on red fire ant alert after deadly species found in Europe. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/11/red‐fire‐ant‐syracuse‐sicily‐italy‐deadly‐europe‐london/ [Google Scholar]
  15. Koen, E. L. , & Newton, E. J. (2021). Outreach increases detections of an invasive species in a crowdsourced monitoring program. Biological Invasions, 23, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kueffer, C. , & Larson, B. M. (2014). Responsible use of language in scientific writing and science communication. Bioscience, 64, 719–724. [Google Scholar]
  17. Larson, B. M. (2005). The war of the roses: Demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 495–500. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lowe, S. , Browne, M. , Boudjelas, S. , & De Poorter, M. (2000). 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: A selection from the global invasive species database (Vol. 12). Invasive Species Specialist Group. [Google Scholar]
  19. McCombs, M. , & Valenzuela, S. (2021). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (3rd ed.). Polity. [Google Scholar]
  20. Regan, H. (2023). Invasive species cost the world $423 billion every year and are causing environmental chaos, UN report finds. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/05/world/invasive‐species‐global‐threat‐report‐climate‐scn‐intl‐hnk/index.html
  21. Roy, H. E. , Pauchard, A. , Stoett, P. , Renard Truong, T. , Bacher, S. , Galil, B. S. , Hulme, P. E. , Ikeda, T. , Sankaran, K. , McGeoch, M. A. , Meyerson, L. A. , & Vandvik, V. (2023). IPBES invasive alien species assessment: Summary for policymakers. IPBES Secretariat. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sherratt, Z. (2024). Warning over Asian hornets after record sightings. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckddw0wg5deo [Google Scholar]
  23. Stevens, S. S. , Amulike, B. , Ndaga, S. , Organ, J. F. , & Serfass, T. L. (2014). The confusion of common names: A methodological challenge. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19, 191–199. [Google Scholar]
  24. Symons, A. (2023). Invasive fire ants have made it to Europe—And they're likely to spread as the climate heats up. Euro News. https://www.euronews.com/green/2023/09/12/invasive‐fire‐ants‐have‐made‐it‐to‐europe‐and‐theyre‐likely‐to‐spread‐as‐the‐climate‐heats [Google Scholar]
  25. Turner, R. M. , Brockerhoff, E. G. , Bertelsmeier, C. , Blake, R. E. , Caton, B. , James, A. , MacLeod, A. , Nahrung, H. F. , Pawson, S. M. , Plank, M. J. , Pureswaran, D. S. , Seebens, H. , Yamanaka, T. , & Liebhold, A. M. (2021). Worldwide border interceptions provide a window into human‐mediated global insect movement. Ecological Applications, 31, Article e02412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vidler, A. (2024). New research suggests fire ants could cost Australia $22 billion by 2040. 9News. https://www.9news.com.au/national/red‐imported‐fire‐ants‐cost‐to‐economy‐could‐be‐billions‐new‐research‐says/29094906‐8e19‐43fc‐b00a‐e7859078cc87 [Google Scholar]
  27. Wong, M. K. L. , Economo, E. P. , & Guénard, B. (2023). The global spread and invasion capacities of alien ants. Current Biology, 33, 566–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Woodworth, E. , Tian, A. , Blair, K. , Pullen, J. , Lefcheck, J. S. , & Parker, J. D. (2023). Media myopia distorts public interest in US invasive plants. Biological Invasions, 25, 3193–3205. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Conservation Biology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES