Table 9.
Comparisons of the proposed model at different batch sizes and learning rates
| Sampling Technique | Batch Size | Learning Rate | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.001 | 97% | 97% | 95% | 94% | ||
| 16 | 0.0001 | 95% | 94% | 97% | 94% | |
| 0.00001 | 95% | 92% | 95% | 92% | ||
| 0.001 | 97% | 93% | 97% | 96% | ||
| Stratified | 32 | 0.0001 | 96% | 88% | 96% | 90% |
| Sampling | 0.00001 | 95% | 92% | 95% | 94% | |
| 0.001 | 97% | 83% | 97% | 90% | ||
| 64 | 0.0001 | 97% | 83% | 97% | 90% | |
| 0.00001 | 94% | 82% | 94% | 85% | ||
| 0.001 | 89% | 64% | 89% | 75% | ||
| 16 | 0.0001 | 89% | 64% | 89% | 75% | |
| 0.00001 | 89% | 64% | 89% | 75% | ||
| 0.001 | 88% | 74% | 88% | 76% | ||
| Random | 32 | 0.0001 | 89% | 64% | 89% | 75% |
| Sampling | 0.00001 | 89% | 64% | 89% | 75% | |
| 0.001 | 90% | 92% | 80% | 72% | ||
| 64 | 0.0001 | 85% | 84% | 85% | 77% | |
| 0.00001 | 89% | 63% | 87% | 70% | ||
| 0.001 | 94% | 95% | 94% | 93% | ||
| 16 | 0.0001 | 96% | 98% | 96% | 95% | |
| 0.00001 | 88% | 68% | 88% | 83% | ||
| 0.001 | 89% | 88% | 89% | 87% | ||
| Holdout | 32 | 0.0001 | 89% | 88% | 86% | 87% |
| Sampling | 0.00001 | 89% | 88% | 89% | 87% | |
| 0.001 | 95% | 84% | 95% | 80% | ||
| 64 | 0.0001 | 89% | 83% | 84% | 85% | |
| 0.00001 | 88% | 81% | 88% | 85% |