Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 12;44(6):1194–1203. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2024.06.008

Table 1.

Changes in venous blood glucose levels in rats (x¯±s, mmol/L)

Time point Normal group
(n = 5)
Model group
(n = 5)
ZYP group
(n = 5)
rhEGF group
(n = 5)
SSD group
(n = 5)
Before injection of STZ 6.59±0.35 6.78±0.44 6.72±0.43 6.70±0.48 6.64±0.60
Day 7 after STZ injection 6.17±0.40 29.72±3.30a 30.44±2.66a 28.20±1.78a 29.78±3.34a
Day 14 after STZ injection 6.28±0.23 31.94±1.38a 32.90±0.46a 30.04±2.86a 29.30±3.87a
Day 7 after treatment 6.21±0.41 30.28±3.44a 27.32±2.70a 28.40±3.19a 28.94±3.47a
Day 14 after treatment 6.26±0.31 30.02±2.62a 24.68±2.06ab 27.20±3.16a 28.78±3.82a

Notes: Normal group: normal rats with skin ulcer; Model group: non-intervention group after the establishment of diabetic ulcer model; ZYP group: after modelling diabetic ulcer, treatment with ZYP formula; rhEGF group: after modelling diabetic ulcer, treatment with epidermal growth factor; SSD group: after modelling diabetic ulcer, treatment with 1% sulfadiazine silver cream. ZYP: Zuyangping; rhEGF: epidermal growth factor; SSD: 1% sulfadiazine silver cream. aP < 0.05, compared with the normal control group; bP < 0.05, compared with the model group. All the treated groups were compared with the model group using the Dunnett’s test. Student’s t-test was used to compare differences between the normal and model groups.