. 2024 Nov 25;14:29210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80870-9

Table 4.

Performance of wedged hepatic venous pressure in assessing portal venous pressure.

	Group A n = 185	Group B n = 84	Group C n = 115	Group D n = 95	Group E n = 137	P value
Agreement between WHVP and PVP	8 (4.3%)	18 (21.4%)	42 (36.5%)	49 (51.6%)	63 (46.0%)	< 0.001
Disagreement between WHVP and PVP	177 (95.7%)	66 (78.6%)	73 (63.5%)	46 (48.4%)	74 (54.0%)
Underestimation of PVP	175 (94.6%)	66 (78.6%)	63 (54.8%)	25 (26.3%)	13 (9.5%)	< 0.001
Overestimation of PVP	2 (1.1%)	0 (0.0%)	10 (8.7%)	21 (22.1%)	61 (44.5%)	< 0.001

Group A
n = 185

Group B
n = 84

Group C
n = 115

Group D
n = 95

Group E
n = 137

P value

Agreement between

WHVP and PVP

(4.3%)

(21.4%)

(36.5%)

(51.6%)

(46.0%)

< 0.001

Disagreement between

WHVP and PVP

177

(95.7%)

(78.6%)

(63.5%)

(48.4%)

(54.0%)

Underestimation of PVP

175

(94.6%)

(78.6%)

(54.8%)

(26.3%)

(9.5%)

< 0.001

Overestimation of PVP

(1.1%)

(0.0%)

(8.7%)

(22.1%)

(44.5%)

< 0.001

WHVP: wedged hepatic venous pressure; PVP: portal venous pressure.