Skip to main content

TABLE 5.

trans-Activation potential of interrupted arginine tract insertions in the Rev–MS-C proteins deleted for the RNA binding and NLS domain of REV

Arginine substitutions in Rev–MS-C RNA bindinga
Subcellular locationb trans-Activationc (SD)
RRE MS2 RRE RREZ-MS2
Δ35/50Rev-i-9R/MS-C +++++ +++++ Nuc>>>Cyt 97 (14.5) 122 (16.7)
Δ35/50Rev-i-Q(R)8/MS-C ++ +++++ Cyt>Nuc 19.8 (2.8) 88 (9.2)
Δ35/50Rev-i-K(R)8/MS-C ND ND Cyt>Nuc 6.4 (2.3) 79 (10.8)
Δ35/50Rev-i-(R)3K(R)5/MS-C ND ND Cyt>Nuc 6.8 (2.4) 65 (9.3)
Δ35/50Rev-i-(K)4R(K)4/MS-C ++++ Cyt>>>Nuc 1.7 (0.5) 6.8 (2.9)
Δ35/50Rev-i-(K)4(R)2(K)3/MS-C +/− ++++ Cyt>>>Nuc 0.8 (0.4) 34 (6.9)
Δ35/50Rev-i-(R)5E(R)3/MS-C ND ND Cyt>>>Nuc 3.3 (1.5) 81 (13.3)
Δ35/50Rev-i-(R)5Q(R)3/MS-C ++ ++++ Cyt>Nuc 14.8 (3.2) 61 (9.2)
Δ35/50Rev-i-(R)2N(R)6/MS-C ND ND Cyt>>Nuc 7.8 (2.8) 59 (7.1)
Δ35/50Rev-i-(R)6S(R)3/MS-C ND ND Cyt>>Nuc 16.4 (3.7) 64 (9.3)
a

RNA binding was evaluated by EMSA at fixed levels of the respective RNAs, but varying the individual proteins, expressed in E. coli as MBP fusion proteins. Binding potentials of mutants are expressed as follows: ++++, 75%; +++, 50%; ++, 25%; +, 1%; and +/−, <0.5% of wt Rev or Rev–MS-C. ND, not determined. 

b

Subcellular localization data are from indirect immunofluorescence microscopy analyses. Nuc, nuclear; Cyt, cytoplasmic. 

c

Mean GAG expression values from five experiments, normalized for transfection efficiency, are tabulated with the respective standard deviations. The positive values are in boldface. wt Rev-induced GAG expression from RRE RNA is assigned a value of 100.