Figure 10.

Forest plots for sensitivity of mild steatosis (CAP < 33%, S1) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The plot includes four studies: Sasso 2010 [16], Jung 2014 [14], Chan 2014 [12], Chan 2017 [13], Siddiqui 2019 [10], Shen 2014 [17], Karlas 2014 [18], Chon 2014 [19], Masaki 2013 [20], and Caussy 2018 [23]. Each study’s sensitivity is represented by a square, with the square size reflecting the study weight in the random effects model. Horizontal lines indicate the 95% CI for each study. The diamond at the bottom represents the pooled sensitivity estimate and its 95% CI, based on the random effects model. Heterogeneity among studies is quantified by I² (3%) and τ² (0.0564), with a p-value of $0.41$ indicating low heterogeneity.