Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 20;17(22):5675. doi: 10.3390/ma17225675

Table 11.

Comparison of model performance on LSR and EPDM datasets for model-type and aging-type classification.

Model Target Dataset Accuracy Precision Recall F1-Score
XGBoost Model Type LSR 0.70 0.71 0.70 0.70
Model Type EPDM 0.69 0.67 0.69 0.68
Aging Type LSR 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.61
Aging Type EPDM 0.62 0.67 0.68 0.67
MLP Model Type LSR 0.59 0.66 0.59 0.59
Model Type EPDM 0.55 0.60 0.55 0.53
Aging Type LSR 0.67 0.60 0.67 0.65
Aging Type EPDM 0.58 0.61 0.62 0.64
DNN Model Type LSR 0.62 0.65 0.62 0.61
Model Type EPDM 0.69 0.66 0.69 0.66
Aging Type LSR 0.70 0.77 0.70 0.71
Aging Type EPDM 0.76 0.78 0.76 0.76
Stacked Model Model Type LSR 0.95 0.93 0.97 0.90
Model Type EPDM 0.84 0.82 0.87 0.89
Aging Type LSR 0.98 0.91 0.95 0.98
Aging Type EPDM 0.83 0.81 0.83 0.87