Skip to main content
. 2024 Nov 26;26(1):bbae611. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae611

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of LIMO-GCN (Inline graphic=0, 0.9, 1 with Inline graphic=0.4) with the state-of-the-art methods. (A) The area under the ROC curves of LIMO-GCN and other methods. (B) The AUPRC of LIMO-GCN and other methods. Comparison from No. of AD risk genes in topK and Precision@K. (C) Comparison of No. of AD risk genes in topK (Inline graphic stands for the number of AD risk genes in top K ranked genes.). (D) Comparison of Precision@K of LIMO-GCN and other methods.